Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/13/429

G Santhosh Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

The MD HDFC Bank Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

31 Oct 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

PRESENT

 

       SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN   : PRESIDENT

     SMT.PREETHA G NAIR: MEMBER

                                     SRI.VIJU.V.R                : MEMBER

 

CC.NO.429/13  (Filed on : 17/10/2013)

ORDER DATED : 31/10/2022

 

COMPLAINANT

 

G.Santhosh kumar,

Residing at House No.BSRA 21A,

Eden Dale, Pettah.P.O
Thiruvananthapuram

 

(BY Adv.M.A.Vahab)

                                                          VS

 

OPPOSITE PARTIES

 

1. The Managing Director,

HDFC Bank Ltd, HDFC Bank House,

Senapati Bapat Marg,

Lower Pareli (W), Mumbai – 400013

 

2. The Manager,

Consumer Finance Division,

HDFC Bank Ltd, Ayurveda College,

•  

 

3. The Manager,

HDFC Bank, PMG, Trivandrum

          (By Adv.T.L.Sreeram)

 

ORDER

 

SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN      : PRESIDENT

1. This complaint is filed under section 12 of Consumer Protection Act 1986 and stood over to this date for consideration and this Commission passed the following order.

2.       This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite parties alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties. After admitting the complaint, notice was issued to the opposite parties. The opposite parties entered appearance and filed written version denying the allegations raised by the complainant. As the complainant was continuously absent and there is no representation, notice was issued to the complainant to appear before this commission on 20/09/2022 to further proceed with this complaint. On 20/09/2022, when the case came up for consideration, it is noticed that, the notice issued to the complainant was returned with endorsement intimations served. Even after serving intimation the complainant has not collected the notice and hence it is deemed that the complainant not accepted the notice even after giving intimation. Subsequently, two or three chances were given to the complainant by adjourning the case to 19/10/2022, 22/10/2022 and 31/10/2022 respectively. When the case came up for consideration on 31/10/2022, complainant was not present and not represented. In the above circumstances, we find that the complainant is not interested to further proceed with this complaint.

                     In the result, complaint is dismissed for default. There will be no order as to costs.

                        A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

     

 

 

           Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Commission, this the 31^st day October 2022.    

                                                                                     Sd/-

P.V.JAYARAJAN    : PRESIDENT

                                                                                      Sd/-

        PREETHA G NAIR      : MEMBER

                                                                                                Sd/-

VIJU.V.R    : MEMBER

                                                                                          

                

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Be/