Orissa

Rayagada

CC/74/2020

Sri sunil Ku Choudhury - Complainant(s)

Versus

The MD Arnodwane Company Pvt Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

Self

24 May 2021

ORDER

DISTRICT  CONSUMER  DISPUTES  REDRESSAL  COMMISSION,   RAYAGADA,             (ODISHA).                                               

                                                                       

C.C.case  No.     74      / 2020.                             Date.     26     . 3. 2021

P R E S E N T .

Sri   Gadadhara  Sahu,                                                      President.

Smt.Padmalaya  Mishra,.                                                 Member

 

Sri Sunik Kumar Choudhury, S/O: Late N.Padmanabha Choudhury,   New Colony, Rayagada(Odisha).                        ….                    Complainant.

Versus.

The Manager,  Hindware company Ltd. Red cross place Kolkate-700001 and Corporate office at Somany home innovation Ltd., 68, Echelon inst. Area, Sector- 32, Gurgaon, Haryana-122001 and 2 others….    Opposite parties.

 

JUDGEMENT

The  crux of the case is that  the above named complainant alleging deficiency in service  against  afore mentioned O.Ps    for non replacement of chiminy  for which  the complainant  sought for redressal of the grievances raised by the complainant.

                                        

Upon  Notice, the O.Ps put in their appearance and filed  written version in which  they refuting allegation made against them.  The O.Ps  taking one and another pleas in the written version   sought to dismiss the complaint as it is not maintainable  under the C.P. Act.  The facts which are not specifically admitted may be treated  as denial of the O.Ps. Hence the O.Ps  prays the forum to dismiss the case against  them  to meet the ends of justice.

During the course of hearing the   complainant has  filed a memo and  submitted that  the complainant  does not want to proceed the above case further  and not interested to proceed  the  case further  and the complainant prays the District Commission  to   close  the case accordingly  as settled out of the court  for the best interest of justice.

  Heard from the parties. During the course of hearing the    the O.Ps has not objected the memo filed by  the complainant.  Perused  the   record  and  memo  filed by the   complainant..  The memo is allowed.

                Accordingly the present dispute mitigated  and the  case stands disposed  off  but O.Ps wriggled out of  liabilities & the  case closed against  them    as  the  complainant   does not want to  proceed  with  the case further against the O.Ps  after settled the matter amicably out of court .and the  complainant has received  new Chimney with  fresh warranty and guarantee.    Parties are left  to bear their own cost.

Dictated and corrected by me.       Pronounced on this     26th.    Day of       March, 2021.

               

                                                                                Member.                                             President