Haryana

Karnal

CC/438/2021

Rahul - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manger, Ess Kay Fincorp Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Randeep Chauhan

23 May 2022

ORDER

BEFORE THE PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

 

                                                         Complaint No.438 of 2021

                                                          Date of instt. 31.08.2021

                                                          Date of Decision: 23.05.2022

 

Rahul age 24 years son of Rishipal, resident of village Sagga Tehsil Nilokheri, District Karnal.

 

                                                                        …….Complainant

                                        Versus

 

1.     The Manager, Ess Kay Fincorp Ltd. Sector 3, Industrial Area Karnal.

2.     Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. Sector 12, Karnal through its Manager.

                                                                        …..Opposite parties.

 

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

 

Before    Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member

                Dr.Rekha Chaudhary…Member

 

Present:  Shri Randeep Chauhan, counsel for the complainant.

                Shri Kunal Chopra, counsel for opposite party no.1.

       

               Today mis. application was fixed for order.

         

               At the stage, main file taken up on the request of learned counsels of both the parties as the matter has been settled between the OP no.1 and complainant amicably. Learned counsel for OP no.1 has suffered a separate statement to the effect that OP no.1. i.e. S.K. Finance Limited has received the loan amount as per settlement. He further stated that OP no.1 will issue the NOC within one month and nothing is due against the complainant.

                On the other hand, learned counsel for complainant has suffered a separate statement to the effect that during the pendency of the complaint, complainant has cleared all loan amount, settled with the company and company is ready to issue the NOC within one month. Now new cause of action has arisen. So, he withdraws the present complaint, with permission to file the fresh complaint against the insurance company i.e.2.

                In view of statement of both the parties, the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Misc. application also disposed of accordingly and tagged with main file. However, the complainant would be at liberty to file afresh complaint against the insurance company, if so desired. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Announced
Dated:23.05.2022

 

                                                                                          President,     

District Consumer Disputes                               

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

 

(Vineet Kaushik)        (Dr. Rekha Chaudhary)

                         Member                         Member