Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

EA/17/2005

Sobha Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Managing Director - Opp.Party(s)

J.Robinson

15 Dec 2009

ORDER


Thiruvananthapuram
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,Vazhuthacaud
Execution Application(EA) No. EA/17/2005

Sobha Kumar
...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

The Managing Director
...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:
1. Smt. Beena Kumari. A 2. Smt. S.K.Sreela 3. Sri G. Sivaprasad

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):




ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

 


 

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM

VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

PRESENT

SRI. G. SIVAPRASAD : PRESIDENT

SMT. BEENAKUMARI. A : MEMBER

SMT. S.K.SREELA : MEMBER

E.A. No. 17/2005

in

O.P. No. 60/2002

Dated : 15.12.2009

Complainant/Decree Holder:


 

Sobha Kumar, Sobhanavilasam Bunglow, Perumthottomkinattuvila, Mulluvila P.O, Neyyattinkara.


 

Opposite party/Judgement Debtor:


 

The Managing Director, Kerala State Road Transport Corporation, Transport Bhavan, East Fort, Thiruvananthapuram.


 

(By adv. J.V. Anoop)


 

ORDER


 

This Forum vide its order dated 22.12.2003 in O.P. No. 60/02 directed the opposite party to return the articles which was found in the bus No. TN 726 to the complainant within two weeks or pay Rs. 10,675/- as its value. Time for compliance two months after that the amount will carry 9% interest. Since the said articles or money was not returned to the complainant Decree Holder has filed this E.A. The previous Forum vide its order dated 28.04.2006 in E.A 17/05 had observed that the Decree Holder is


 


 

liable to get refund only if the judgement debtor failed to deliver the article found in the bus and directed the Decree Holder to approach the Judgement Debtor on the basis of the letter dated 07.12.2005 to satisfy the decree. Judgement Debtor filed objection stating that still Decree Holder has not approached Judgement Debtor for collecting the materials. Judgement Debtor furnished the said articles before this Forum, but Decree Holder says the articles submitted by the Judgement Debtor do not belong to him. Since the articles and its quantities were not separately identified at trial stage, we cannot direct Judgement Debtor to produce the articles as visualised by the Decree Holder. In view of the matter, we direct the Decree Holder to receive the articles furnished by the Judgement Debtor before court.

 


 

G. SIVAPRASAD,

President.

BEENAKUMARI. A : MEMBER


 


 

S.K. SREELA : MEMBER


 


 

 

 




......................Smt. Beena Kumari. A
......................Smt. S.K.Sreela
......................Sri G. Sivaprasad