Kerala

Palakkad

CC/68/2021

Murali Alias Leela Krishnan - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Managing Director - Opp.Party(s)

27 Jun 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PALAKKAD
Near District Panchayath Office, Palakkad - 678 001, Kerala
 
Complaint Case No. CC/68/2021
( Date of Filing : 08 Apr 2021 )
 
1. Murali Alias Leela Krishnan
S/o. Krishna Menon, Marutha Road Palam, Pudusserry West, Palakkad.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Managing Director
Tushar Flooring Selection, 8/944, NH 47, Kadamkode, Palakkad.
2. The Managing Director
Zed Vitrified Pvt. Ltd., 8-A, National Highway, Opp. Lalpar Power House, At- Lalpar , Gujarat.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Vinay Menon.V PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Krishnankutty. N.K MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 27 Jun 2023
Final Order / Judgement

  DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PALAKKAD

Dated this the  27th day of  June, 2023 

 

Present      :    Sri. Vinay Menon V., President

                  :   Sri. Krishnankutty N.K., Member                               Date of Filing:  05/04/2021    

 

            CC/68/2021

  

Murali @ Leelakrishnan,

S/o.Krishna Menon,

Marutharoad Palam,

Pudussery West, Palakkad                                          -                       Complainant

(Party in Person)

  

                                                                                                Vs

  1. The Managing Director,

Tushar Flooring Selection,

8/944, N.H.47, Kadamkode,

Palakkad

 

  1. The Managing Director,

Zed Vitrified Pvt.Ltd.,

8A, National Highway,

Opp. Lal Par Power House,

Gujarat                                                                 -                       Opposite parties  

(O.P.s by  Adv.Ullas Sudhakaran)

 

O R D E R

By  Sri. Vinay Menon V., President

 

  1. Complainant is aggrieved by the change in shades and lines on the tiles purchased by him from first opposite party and manufactured by 2nd opposite party.
  2. The complainant was directed to file proof affidavit on 16/3/2023 and posted to 20/4/2023. On that day, complainant did not file proof affidavit and the matter was posted to 18/5/2023 as final chance. On 18/5/2023, there was no sitting and the case was adjourned to 26/6/2023.
  3. On 26/6/2023 the complainant had not filed proof affidavit. He was not present court either.  Hence the matter was taken for orders on merits. 
  4. Complainant has not taken any steps like appointment of a Commissioner who can report on the condition/nature of tiles to prove that the tiles purchased by him changed its shades owing to manufacturing defect of the tiles. Further he had also not filed his proof affidavit after providing ample time.
  5. Hence we presume that there are no merits in the case of the complainant. Accordingly,  this complaint is dismissed.

                  Pronounced in open court on this the  27th day of June, 2023.       

                                                                                                                                Sd/-

                                                                                                            Vinay Menon V

                                                                President

                      Sd/-

            Krishnankutty N.K.

                                                                                                                     Member

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Vinay Menon.V]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Krishnankutty. N.K]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.