Tamil Nadu

South Chennai

CC/19/2017

K.Suresh - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Managing Director. M/s.Samsung Electronics Co Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

V.P.Raju

10 Apr 2019

ORDER

                                                                                Date of Filing  : 20.12.2016                                                                          Date of Order  : 10.04.2019

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (SOUTH)

@ 2ND Floor, T.N.P.S.C. Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3.

 

PRESENT: THIRU. M. MONY, B.Sc., L.L.B, M.L.                    : PRESIDENT

TR. R. BASKARKUMARAVEL, B.Sc., L.L.M., BPT., PGDCLP.  : MEMBER

 

C.C. No.19/2017

DATED THIS WEDNESDAY THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2019

K. Suresh,

S/o. Mr. Kannan,

No.W33C, Kamba Circle ,

BSNL Quarters,

11th Main Road,

Anna Nagar,

Chennai – 600 040.                                                   .. Complainant.

..Versus.. 

1. The Managing Director,

Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.,

New Delhi.

 

2. The Manager,

Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.,

Express Avenue Mall, 8th & 9th Floors,

No.49501, Whites Road,

Royapetteh,

Chennai – 600 014.

 

3. The Manager,

Vijay Electronics,

Samsung Smart Plaza,

No.53/32, North Usman Road,

T. Nagar,

Chennai – 600 017.                                                .. Opposite parties.

 

Counsel for the complainant         :  M/s. V.P. Raju & others

Counsel for the opposite parties  :  M/s. V.V. Giridhar & another

                                                           

 

ORDER

THIRU. M. MONY, PRESIDENT

 

This complaint has been filed by the complainant against the opposite parties under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 praying to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/- being the cost of Television together with interest at 18% p.a. from the date of filing of this complaint to till the date of realization, to pay sum of Rs.1,50,000/- towards compensation for mental agony, irreparable hardship and loss suffered by the complainant and to pay a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards compensation for additional loss towards no regular family entertainment with cost to the complainant.

Proof affidavit of the complainant is not filed for a long time to prove the allegations raised in the complaint.  The complainant and Counsel called absent for a long time.  Hence, this complaint is dismissed for default.

Dated this Wednesday the 10th day of April 2019.

 

 

MEMBER                                                                      PRESIDENT

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.