The case record is posted today for hearing. Both the parties are absent and no steps on their behalf is taken up. On repeated calls, also the parties are absent. Thus, the hearing of the case could not be taken up. 

                                         In the present case, the notice against O.P No.1 was sufficient and the O.P No.2 appeared and filed written version. As it appears from the case record, the Complainant remained absent and slept over the matter since 22.04.2020 and no step is taken nor did his advocate take any step on his behalf. From the above nature and conduct of the Complainant, it is clearly made out that the Complainant has no interest to prosecute his case and unnecessarily wasted the valuable time of this Commission. That apart, on 29.08.2018 and 25.09.2018, the O.P No.2 prayed for time for settlement of the matter and for payment. But interestingly, the O.P No.2 remained absent since 25.09.2018. In the above aspect and considering the facts and circumstances of the case so also the nature and conduct of the parties, this Commission is of the view that the complaint of the Complainant should be dismissed.         

                                         Accordingly, the complaint of the Complainant is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case.