Punjab

Jalandhar

CC/245/2023

Raj Kumar S/o Daljeet Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Managing Director, PPR Associates, - Opp.Party(s)

N.S.Minhas

12 Jul 2023

ORDER

Distt Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Ladowali Road, District Administrative Complex,
2nd Floor, Room No - 217
JALANDHAR
(PUNJAB)
 
Complaint Case No. CC/245/2023
( Date of Filing : 22 Jun 2023 )
 
1. Raj Kumar S/o Daljeet Singh
h.no. 297-a,maharaja ranjit singh avenue,jalandhar
jalandhar
PUNJAB
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Managing Director, PPR Associates,
Silver Heights Apartment, Wadala Chowk, Nakodar Road, Jalandhar
jalandhar
PUNJAB
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  Harveen Bhardwaj PRESIDENT
  Jyotsna MEMBER
  Jaswant Singh Dhillon MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
None for the Complainant.
......for the Complainant
 
Dated : 12 Jul 2023
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES

REDRESSAL COMMISSION, JALANDHAR.

 Complaint No.245 of 2023

      Date of Instt. 22.06.2023

      Date of Decision: 12.07.2023

Raj Kumar age about 38 years Son of Daljeet Singh R/o V.P.O. Lallian Kalan, Jalandhar.

..........Complainant

Versus

The Managing Director, PPR Associates, Silver Heights Apartments, Wadala Chowk, Nakodar Road, Jalandhar.

….….. Opposite Party

Complaint Under the Consumer Protection Act.

Before:         Dr. Harveen Bhardwaj            (President)

 Smt. Jyotsna                           (Member)

 Sh. Jaswant Singh Dhillon      (Member)                      

 

Present:        None for the Complainant.

Order

Dr. Harveen Bhardwaj (President)

1.                The complainant has alleged that he is the owner of the Flat No.24, 2nd Floor, Block-C, situated at Silver Heights Apartments, Nakodar Road, Jalandhar. He has further alleged that he had given the flat on rent to somebody and meter was also installed in his name in the flat, but the OP has stopped him from entering in the apartment/flat complex of which he is legally entitled. In order to file a complaint before the Consumer Commission, the complainant is to satisfy the Commission as to whether he is consumer or not as per the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act.

Section 2(1)(d) in the Consumer Protection Act, 1986

(d) “Consumer” means any person who,—

(i) buys any goods for a consideration which has been paid or promised or partly paid and partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment and includes any user of such goods other than the person who buys such goods for consideration paid or promised or partly paid or partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment, when such use is made with the approval of such person, but does not include a person who obtains such goods for resale or for any commercial purpose; or

(ii) 12 [hires or avails of] any services for a consideration which has been paid or promised or partly paid and partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment and includes any beneficiary of such services other than the person who 12 [hires or avails of] the services for consideration paid or promised, or partly paid and partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment, when such services are availed of with the approval of the first mentioned person 13 [but does not include a person who avails of such services for any commercial purpose];

                   In the present case, the complainant has produced on record the document, which is the booking agreement and he has also produced on record the receipt of payment made by him. From these documents i.e. Ex.C-1 to Ex.C-3, it is not clear to whom and by whom the payment was made and in what connection the same was made. The electricity bill of PSPCL, which shows that it relates to the period of 26.10.2017. No bill after 26.10.2017 has been filed on record by the complainant to show that he is in occupation of the flat nor any rent agreement has been filed on record to show that it was given on rent. As per the provision of Consumer Protection Act, OP has not given any services for consideration so far as the entering of the flat is concerned. So, as per the provision of Consumer Protection Act, he is not a consumer and complaint is not maintainable and the same is disposed of. Copy of the order be supplied to the complainant free of cost, as per Rules. File be consigned to the record room.

 

Dated           Jaswant Singh Dhillon   Jyotsna     Dr. Harveen Bhardwaj     

12.07.2023         Member                             Member          President

 
 
[ Harveen Bhardwaj]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Jyotsna]
MEMBER
 
 
[ Jaswant Singh Dhillon]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.