Tamil Nadu

North Chennai

CC/02/2018

Mr.Anbalagan.s/o.Karuppaiah - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Managing Director, ONIDA corporate office.MIRC Electronic limited - Opp.Party(s)

M/s.N.Meenakshi sundaram

03 Nov 2022

ORDER

            DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI (NORTH)

@ 2^ND Floor, T.N.P.S.C. Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai – 600 003.

 

PRESENT : THIRU G. VINOBHA, M.A., B.L.,                          : PRESIDENT

                                  TMT. KAVITHA KANNAN, M.E.                          : MEMBER-I

                                  THIRU V. RAMAMURTHY, B.A., B.L., PGDLA : MEMBER-II

                      

THURSDAY THE 03^rd DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022

C.C.NO.02/2018

 

Mr.Anbalagan, S/o. Karuppiah,

Plot No.14, 3^rd floor, GP Swamy nagar,

Veeramani Nagar,

Nanmangalam, Chennai-600 117.

                                                                                                     …..Complainant

 ..Vs..

1. The Managing Director,

ONIDA Corporate Office,

MIRC Electronics Limited,

18, 4^th Lane,  1^st floor,

Nungambakkam High Road,

(next to MOP Vaishnav college), Chennai-600 034.

 

2. The Managing Director/In charge,

Corporate Office of Vasanth & Co.,

No.14 2^nd floor, Railway Border,

1^st Street, Near Aranganathan subway,

kaveri Nagar, Saidapet,

Chennai-600 015.

 

3. The Manager,

Vasanth & Co.,

NO.17, 100 feet road

Velachery, Chennai-600 042.                                                   ….Opposite party.

Counsel for Complainant                             : M/s.Meenakshisundaram

Counsel for 1^st Opposite party                       : M/s.S.K.Mariyappan.

Counsel for 2^nd & 3^rd Opposite party             : M/s.D.Vijayakumar and 1 other.

 

 

ORDER

BY PRESIDENT THIRU. G.VINOBHA, M.A.,B.L.,

          This complaint is filed by the complainant u/s 12 of the Consumer Protection Act.1986.

          The complainant filed this complaint against the opposite parties to bear the responsibility to this matter and replace the defective product i.e. TV, manufactured by 1^st opposite party sold by 2^nd and 3^rd opposite parties and to pay damages to the extent of Rs.100000/- being loss suffered by the complainant as a result of the defect goods and deficiency in service, and the damages for the mental tension, agony and disappointment suffered by the complainant at the hand of the opposite parties and cost of this complaint.

          Complainant absent.  No representation. Complainant counsel absent.  Sufficient time already granted.  Complainant has no interest in prosecuting the complaint.  Hence the complaint is dismissed for default.

 Order Pronounced dated 03^rd  November  2022.

 

MEMBER – I                         MEMBER – II                                          PRESIDENT