Chandigarh

StateCommission

CC/32/2018

Mrs. Arti Makkar - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Managing Director, M/s Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Inderpal Singh Bhinder, Adv.

18 Jul 2018

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
UT CHANDIGARH
 
Complaint Case No. CC/32/2018
( Date of Filing : 18 Jan 2018 )
 
1. Mrs. Arti Makkar
Chandigarh
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Managing Director, M/s Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd.
Chandigarh
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  DEV RAJ PRESIDING MEMBER
  PADMA PANDEY MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 18 Jul 2018
Final Order / Judgement

 

 

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

                                    U.T., CHANDIGARH 

Consumer Complaint No.

 

32 of 2018

Date of Institution

 

18.01.2018

Date of Decision

 

18.07.2018

         Mrs.Arti Makkar wife of Anil Makkar and Anil Makkar son of Sh.Om Parkash Makkar,both residents of Flat No.605, Magnolia Tower, Mayfair Apartments, Sector-70,SASNagar (Mohali)

                                                                        ….Complainants 

                                                   Versus

  1.   The Managing Director, M/s Ansal Properties & Infrastructure       Ltd. 115, Ansal Bhawan, 16, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New      Delhi. 
  2.   M/s Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. 115, Ansal   Bhawan, 16, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi.

2nd address:  

    M/s Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd., SCO 183-84, Sector-9-C, Madhya Marg, Chandigarh.

  1.   M/s Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited(HDFC Ltd), through its Authorized signatory/Managing Directors having branch office at SCO No.153-155, Sector-8-C, Madhya Marg, Chandigarh.

                                                                                                   ……Opposite Parties

 

                 Complaint  under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act,1986

 

Argued by:     Sh.Inderpal Singh Bhinder, Advocate for the complainants.

                        Sh.Rachit Kaushal, Advocate for the Opposite Parties No.1 &2

                        None for OP No.3

 

BEFORE:       MR.DEV RAJ, PRESIDING MEMBER

                       MRS. PADMA PANDEY, MEMBER

 

PER  DEV RAJ, PRESIDING MEMBER

                 Vide our separate detailed order of the even date, recorded in Consumer Complaint bearing No.9 of 2018 titled as Tarun Gupta & another  Vs. The Managing Director, M/s Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Ltd. & ors.  this complaint has been partly accepted with costs against Opposite Parties No.1 & 2 as per the directions given therein. Complaint against Opposite Party No.3 (HDFC Ltd.) has been dismissed, with no order as to costs.

2.          Certified copy of the order passed in consumer complaint bearing No. 9 of 2018 shall also be placed on this file.

3..       Certified copies of this order, alongwith the main order passed in consumer complaint bearing No. 9 of 2018, be sent to the parties, free of charge.

  1.           The file be consigned to Record Room, after completion.

 

 

       

 
 
[ DEV RAJ]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[ PADMA PANDEY]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.