Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/47/2011

C. Kaliaperumal - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Managing Director, Malar Hospital(Fortis) - Opp.Party(s)

S. Sathish Rajan,

15 Sep 2021

ORDER

BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

BEFORE               Hon’ble Thiru.Justice R.SUBBIAH                           PRESIDENT

                    TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                          MEMBER

MPSR.No.1011 / 2019 in CC.No.47/2011

                                                         DATED THE 15^th   DAY OF SEPTEMBER  2021

Mr.C.Kaliaperumal (deceased).                                                                                                          ..  Complainant

2.K.Bhuvaneswari W/o Late. Kaliaperumal

   No.E2/968, 37^th Cross Street,

   Thiruvalluvar Nagar,

   Thiru Vanmiyur,

   Chennai-600 041.

3.S.Ragini W/o. Senthil Kumar

   No.1051, 1^st Floor,

   36^th Cross Street,

   Thiruvalluvar Nagar,

   Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai – 600 041.

4.P.Revathi W/o. Pugazhendhi,

   No.22/M 1077, 7^th Main Road,

   Thiruvalluvar Nagar,

   Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai – 600 041.

5.L.Lavanya W/o. Loganathan,

   No.E/2/875, 46^th Cross Street,

   Thiruvalluvar Nagar,

   Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai – 600 041.     .Petitioners/Proposed Complainants 2 to 5

Vs.

The Managing Director,

Malar Hospital (Fortis)

No.52, 1^st Main Road,

Gandhi Nagar, Adyar,

Chennai – 600 020.                                                                                        .. Respondent / Opposite Party            

Counsel for Petitioner  /Complainant          :  M/s Sathish Rajan

Counsel for Respondent / Opposite party    :  M/s. R. Parthasarathy

DOCKET ORDER

          The counsel for the Respondent present. No representation for petitioner/complainant. The petitioner/complainant has filed a petition praying to bring on record the petitioners as complainants 2 to 5 as Legal heirs of deceased complainant.

          The said complaint was returned by the Registry for certain compliance. But till date the returns has not been complied with. Today the matter posted for appearance of petitioner or for dismissal. When the matter called at 10.30 a.m there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence the matter passed over and again called at 12 p.m even at 12 p.m there was no representation for the petitioner.

          Hence the MPSr is rejected consequently CC.47/2011 is dismissed as abated.

 

               Sd/-                                                                                                                                                    Sd/-

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                                                                    R.SUBBIAH  

            MEMBER                                                                                                                                     PRESIDENT