Tamil Nadu

South Chennai

CC/186/2015

M/s.Chithra Venkatachalam - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Managing Director, Jeyachandran Textiles - Opp.Party(s)

A.Maninaran

02 Mar 2017

ORDER

                                                                        Date of Filing :   20.04.2015

                                                                        Date of Order :   02.03.2017

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (SOUTH)

     2^nd Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3

PRESENT: THIRU.  S. PANDIAN, B.Sc., L.L.M.                      : PRESIDENT   

                  TMT. K.AMALA, M.A. L.L.B.,                                 : MEMBER I   

          DR. T.PAUL RAJASEKARAN, M.A ,D.Min.PGDHRDI, AIII,BCS : MEMBER II

C.C.NO.186/2015

    THURSDAY THIS  2^nd  DAY OF MARCH 2017

 

Mrs. Chithra Venkatachalam,

W/o. Venkatachalam,

No.55/10, Raji Street,

West Mambalam,

Near SRM Road,

Chennai 600 033.                                           ..Complainant   

                                             ..Vs..

 

The Managing Director,

Jeyachandran Textiles, (A Unit of

Jeyachandran Industrial Limited),

NO.27, Ranganathan Street,

Thiyagaraya Nagar, Chennai 600 017.              ..Opposite party

 

For the Complainant                    :  M/s. A.Manimaran   

For the opposite party                 :  M/s. Siva Syuambu

ORDER

THIRU. S. PANDIAN,

 Complaint under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986. Complaint is filed seeking direction against the opposite party to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- as compensation for mental agony and hardship  with interest and also to pay a sum of Rs.2,000/- as cost of the complaint.  

 

Proof affidavit of complainant not filed.  No representation on the side of the complainant.

At 3.15 P.M.

The complainant is called absent, No other representation.   In spite of sufficient time is given and pending from 27.7.2015, the complainant

 

has not come forward to file the proof affidavit as her evidence in order    to prove the allegations made in the complaint.  Therefore it is clearly shows that the disinterest of the complainant in the further progress of this complaint.  Hence, there is no justification to prolong this matter further. 

        In the result, this complaint is dismissed for default.  No cost.

 

MEMBER-I                        MEMBER-II                              PRESIDENT.