Kerala

Wayanad

CC/139/2020

Nitheesh N.H, Aged 30 Years, S/o Haridas, Nechiyel House, Vaduvanchal, Kadamal Post - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Managing Director, Dijibiz Built on quality Rating Pvt. Ltd., Door No 1521, 5th Floor, Highlight - Opp.Party(s)

Adv. K.J Vijayakumar

06 Jan 2023

ORDER

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
CIVIL STATION ,KALPETTA
WAYANAD-673122
PHONE 04936-202755
 
Complaint Case No. CC/139/2020
( Date of Filing : 25 Nov 2020 )
 
1. Nitheesh N.H, Aged 30 Years, S/o Haridas, Nechiyel House, Vaduvanchal, Kadamal Post
Sulthan Bathery Taluk
Wayanad
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Managing Director, Dijibiz Built on quality Rating Pvt. Ltd., Door No 1521, 5th Floor, Highlight Business Park, Kozikkode-14
Highlight Business Park
Kozhikkode
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. Beena M PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. A.S Subhagan MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 06 Jan 2023
Final Order / Judgement

By  Sri. A.S. Subhagan, Member:

 

          This is a complaint filed under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986.

 

          2. Facts of the case in brief:-   The Complainant   had  entered into  a contract for the construction of a building on 21.11.2019  with the Opposite Party.  The Contract was for the construction of a two storied building having 1420 sq.ft area to be completed within six months with  31 other conditions, payment conditions,  nature of construction, details of materials to be used etc.  The rate of consideration agreed upon between the parties was Rs.1,315/-  per sq.ft and on 21.11.2019  itself,    the Opposite Party had received Rs.50,000/-  as advance from the  Complainant.  The balance  amount was agreed to be paid,  stage by stage,  as agreed in the contract.  But, violating the terms of agreement, without any  valid reasons  and without doing the work timely and properly, the Opposite Party delayed the work and frequently   demanded excess money than the cost of work completed  and thereby, the Opposite Party accepted Rs.6,36,598/-  from the  Complainant after doing some part of the  concreting of the lintel costing only about Rs.4,00,000/-.  The Complainant had to conduct the opening ceremony  of the house on 30.06.2020 and as the Complainant  was residing in a rented house,  had regularly used to tell the Opposite Party to complete the construction.  Even though, without any responsibility to the Complainant,  the Opposite Party committed severe deficiency in service causing financial loss, inexplicable  unconvenience,  loss and injury,  mental agony and unnecessary expenses to the Complainant and his family.  On 20.08.2020,  the Complainant had given a direct notice to the Opposite Party,  showing all these facts.  The Complainant had intimated  the Opposite Party that, as the period of contract expired,  the Complainant should complete the remaining work by himself and had directed the Opposite Party to refund the balance amount available in Rs.6,36,598/-  received by the Opposite Party,  after deducting the amount eligible to the Opposite Party.  Due to the negligent  attitude, of the Opposite Party, the Complainant was constrained to do the work using others and for that purpose the Complainant had to borrow money for interest,  from many others.  And  moreover,  the Complainant is spending  at the rate of Rs.10,000/-  per month for house  rent for his residence.  The quality of construction work is not good, as low  quality materials are used.  For all these,  the Opposite Party alone is responsible and liable.  So a lawyer’s notice was forwarded to the Opposite Party by the Complainant on 25.09.2020.  Though the lawyers  notice was received by the  Opposite Party, he had not responded to it.  Hence this  complaint with prayers.

  1.  To direct the Opposite Party to refund the excess amount of Rs.2,36,598/-  received from the Complainant  with 12% interest from the date of the complaint.
  2. To direct the Opposite Party to pay Rs.1,00,000/-  as compensation.
  3. To direct the Opposite Party to pay Rs.5,000/-  as cost of this complaint and
  4. To grant any other relief that the Complainant may pray as to the circumstances of this case.

 

3. Notice  was  served  upon  the  Opposite Party  for  appearance.  Opposite

Party appeared and filed version but he did not appear for giving evidence and hence,  he was declared ex-parte.  The Complainant filed proof affidavit,  Exts.A1 to A7 were marked from his side and he was examined as PW1.  Ext.A1 is  the Copy of the signed agreement executed between the parties,  Ext.A2 is the lawyer’s notice forwarded to the Opposite Party by the Complainant, Ext.A3 is the postal receipt,  Ext.A4 is the  postal acknowledgment card,  Ext.A5(a) and Ext.A5(b) are the copies of account statement of the Complainant with the Union Bank of  India,  Kalpetta Branch, Ext.A6 is the  photo of the building under construction referred in the contract and Ext.A7 is the statement of quantity of work with expenses.

 

          4. On  scrutiny of the document marked as Ext.A1,  it is seen that the parties to the complaint  had entered into  a contract for the construction of  building for the Complainant on the basis of the terms and  conditions specified in the contract.  Ext.A5(a) and A5(b) documents reveal that an amount of Rs.5,86,598/- have been paid to the Opposite Party and the Complainant contented that he had given Rs.50,000/-  as advance to the Opposite Party at the time of signing  the contract.  That is the Opposite Party has received a total  contract money of Rs.5,86,598 + 50,000= 6,36,598 from the Complainant.  The Ext.A7  document produced by the Complainant reveals that the total cost of work done is Rs.3,56,816/-.  So  the excess  amount received by the Opposite Party from the Complainant comes to Rs.6,36,598-3,56,816 = 2,79,782.  But  in the complaint, the Complainant has stated that the Opposite Party has done works costing  about Rs.4,00,000/-.  Moreover the Complainant has  prayed to get refund of Rs.2,36,598/- as the excess amount received by the Opposite Party.

 

          5. The Opposite Party had the  opportunity to contest his case but he did not  do so and  hence we have no other option than to believe the allegations of the Complainant.  From the complaint filed,   proof affidavit, Exts.A1 to A7 marked and the oral deposition of the  Complainant, Commission find that the Opposite Party had failed to perform his part in the contract which is deficiency in service from the part of the Opposite  Party for  which he is responsible and liable to compensate the Complainant.  Therefore,  the  Complainant has the right to get relief as prayed for in the complaint. 

 

          In the result,  the complaint is allowed and the Opposite Party is directed:

  1.  To pay Rs.2,36,598/-  (Rupees Two lakh Thirty Six thousand Five hundred and Ninety Eight only) to the Complainant being the excess amount received than the cost of  works done with 12% interest from the  date of this complaint.
  2. To pay Rs.1,00,000/-  (Rupees One Lakh only) to the Complainant as compensation  for deficiency in service and
  3. To pay Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand only) as cost of this complaint.

 

The above amounts shall be paid to the  Complainant by the  Opposite Party

within one month from the date of this order failing which the amounts will carry interest at the rate of   8% per annum from the date of this order.

 

          Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by him and corrected by me

 

and pronounced in the Commission on this the 6th  day of January 2023.   

Dated of filing:06.11.2020.                                                     

PRESIDENT (I/C)         :    Sd/-

MEMBER           :    Sd/-

 

 

APPENDIX.

 

Witness for the complainant:

 

PW1.                    Nitheesh. N.H.               Complainant.

                  

Witness for the Opposite Party:

 

Nil.   

           

 

Exhibits for the complainant:

 

A1.        Copy of Agreement.                       dt:21.11.2019.

A2.        Copy of Lawyer Notice.                 dt:25.09.2020.

A3.        Postal Receipt.                               dt:25.09.2020.

A4.        Acknowledgement.    

A5 (a)    Statement of Account  for the period from 01.01.2020 to 30.09.2020.

A5 (b).   Report for the  period  from 01.01.2020  to 30.09.2020.

A6.        Photo.                                          

A7.        Statement of  Quantity of work with expenses.       

         

Exhibits for the Opposite Party:

 

Nil.

                                                                                                                PRESIDENT (I/C):  Sd/-

                                                                                                                 MEMBER            :  Sd/-

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Beena M]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. A.S Subhagan]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.