Bihar

Muzaffarpur

CC/86/2011

Vijay Roy - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Managing Director, Cum Superintendent Hospital & Others - Opp.Party(s)

Arun Kumar

02 Jul 2018

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, MUZAFFARPUR
BIHAR
 
Complaint Case No. CC/86/2011
( Date of Filing : 23 Aug 2011 )
 
1. Vijay Roy
Vill-Lalpur, P.S.-Hathauri, Distt.-Muzaffarpur
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Managing Director, Cum Superintendent Hospital & Others
Tish hazari, New Delhi & Others
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Govind Prasad Singh PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Dr. Narayan Bhagat MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:Arun Kumar , Advocate
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 02 Jul 2018
Final Order / Judgement

Order

            The complainant Vijay Roy  has filed his case  for claim of Rs. 2 lakh including the treatment expenses Rs. 1,87,000/- Rs. 10,000/- for physical, mental, harassment , and Rs. 30,000/-  for litigation cost. 15-02-2017 .

 The case of complainant  appears from his complaint petition dated 19-08-2011  supported with an affidavit filed on  23-08-2011   that his wife Sugan Devi was started to take medical treatment  from November 2009 from Hospital  Sent Stiphen, Tishahari,  Delhi where several stapes  were followed as per direction of the Dr. Prag Gputa but has admitted her on 29-12-2009 in his hospital and has filed fix date of operation as  on 21-02-2010 and operation was done one pipe also connected during the operation connected with Kidney latter on X.ray was done and was informed that no stone is available in her kidney but after operation the vomiting was continued the complain of  sever pain in her stomach . As per direction of Dr. Prag Gputa she has taken medicines continued. Dr. has advised her to go their  home town  and contacted with gynecologist, accordingly she came toMuzaffarpur  and  got examined  in Prashant medical Hospital from where X.ray, ultrasound was made and it appears that in her left   kidney stone is available by that she is suffering from pain  and vomiting. After hearing the said  fact. It appears in his mind that  the Dr. with Hospital Manament under the connivance they have got expended Rs. 1,87,000/- in treatment of wife and  he became astronished as such it appears that the discrepancy arises against  o.p again. He contacted  in July, August and September, 2010 to the o.p for pain   and swelling.  He has further alleged that the Hospital kept his all  treatment receipt  and  as such others only he has filed Xerox copy of the said prescriptions  of treatment and receipt of medicines and after serving the legal notice dated 01-07-2011 the complainant has filed this case with aforesaid claim.

             The complainant has filed Xerox  copy of  several papers  such as payment receipts, of several dates, X.ray report, Ultrasound  report, copy of legal notice.

            The complainant has filed affidavit of his witnesses in support of his case they are wife of complainant   Sugan Devi dated 08-04-2012 Arun Kr, Mishra, Rajendra Roy, Panwan, Kr. Vijay Roy complainant dated 05-03-2013 who have substantiated the alleged  fact made by the complainant is complaint petition they are not cross examined by o.p.

            The complainant has filed certain original receipts regarding her treatment in the o.p Hospital including the cash memos.

 In this case o.p  appeared and filed his application dated 02-06-2012 alleged therein that the allegation  made in complaint are false and baseless and not true and correct the o.p has challenged the jurisdiction of this forum as o.p Hospital is situate at Delhi where she has got treatment alleged to be deficiency  and as such no cause of action arises against the o.p. He has further relied on section -11 of CP Act against whom complaint can be  lodged, the o.p is doing his business out of jurisdiction of this forum he had no any branch office under the territorial  jurisdiction of this forum and on this ground  he has prayed to dismiss the case.

Considering the facts circumstances material available with the record as well as allegation of the respective parties it is admittedly clear tha the case of complainant  is only against the joint director and Hospital and Dr. Parag Gupta both of    Sent Stephens  Hospital  Tishahazi Delhi no any other person has been made party who is doing his business  as branch office of o.p in the territorial jurisdiction of this forum. As such it is clear cut defect of territorial of jurisdiction and this forum has got no jurisdiction to try this case.

            Accordingly the case is stand dismiss.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Govind Prasad Singh]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Dr. Narayan Bhagat]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.