Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/70/2015

Nalinishree W/o Late K.M.Madhavan - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Managing Director, Cookscape - The Kitchen Gallery, Orchid Designs Pvt Ltd,d - Opp.Party(s)

M/s.S.Vijay Anand

29 Jun 2022

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/70/2015
( Date of Filing : 06 May 2015 )
 
1. Nalinishree W/o Late K.M.Madhavan
No.C-3, 3rd Main Road, New No.25, Kasturibai Nagar, Ceebros Apartments, Adyar, Chennai-600020.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Managing Director, Cookscape - The Kitchen Gallery, Orchid Designs Pvt Ltd,d
No.11, Cenetoph Road, Chennai-600018.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. R.VENKATESAPERUMAL MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 29 Jun 2022
Final Order / Judgement

        STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                          BEFORE    Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH           ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                                Thiru.R.VENKATESA PERUMAL                     ::     MEMBER

 

CC. No. 70/2015

                                                                 DATED THIS THE 29th   DAY OF JUNE 2022

 

Nalinishree,

Wife of Late K.M.Madhavan,

No. C-3, 3rd Main Road,

New No.25, Kasturibai Nagar,

Ceebros Apartments, Adayar,

Chennai 600 020                                                         ..complainant

                                                 Vs

The Managing Director,

Cookscape – The Kitchen Gallery

Orchid Designs Private Limited,

No.11, cenetoph Road,

Chennai 600 018                                                 ..opposite party

 

Counsel for the complainant                      : M/s Vijay Anand

Counsel for the opposite party                  : M/s R.Chandra Sudha

 

          This complaint is coming on before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court :-

                                                        Docket order

          No representation for complainant. Opposite parties present. This complaint is posted today for appearance of complainant and for arguments in list or for dismissal. When the matter was called at 11.00 A.M the complainant was not present, hence passed over and called again at 12.45 noon, then also the complainant has not appeared. Hence we are of the view that keeping the complaint pending is of no use as the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case. The complaint is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.

            Sd/-                                                                                                         Sd/-

  R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                R. SUBBIAH

               MEMBER                                                                                  PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 

 

     

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. R.VENKATESAPERUMAL]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.