Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/143/2015

N.Nithya, & anr - Complainant(s)

Versus

The managing Director, Antony Projects Pvt, Ltd, & 4 Ors - Opp.Party(s)

T.Shyamala Chandrasekar

03 Feb 2021

ORDER

BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

BEFORE                     Hon’ble Thiru.Dr. Justice S.TAMILVANAN      PRESIDENT

                                      Tmt.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                   MEMBER

                                                                                   CC.No.143/2015

                                                        DATED THE 03^rd  DAY OF FEBRUARY  2021

 

1.M/s. N. Nithya,

   D/o. Natarajan,

   42/18, “Veda Bhavanam”

   Gandhi Salai,

   Palavanthangal,

   Chennai – 600 114.

 

2.Mrs. V. Geetha,

   W/o. Natarajan,

   “Sreeabirami” , 2, M.S.P. Teacher’s Colony,

   Siluvathur Road,

   Dindigul – 624 005.                                                                                                               ..  Complainants

Vs.

 

1.The Managing Director,

   Antony Projects Pvt. Ltd.,

   New No:14, Old No.26,

   “U” Block, 10 th Street,

   Anna Nagar, Chennai – 600 040.

 

2.Mr. Senthil Kumar,

   S/o. T. Raju,

   No.1A, Cheransalai,

   Vigneshwara Nagar,

   Porur,   Chennai – 600 116.

 

3.The Assistant Manager,

   The LIC Housing Finance Ltd.,

   New No.15, Old No.38, III Floor,

   South India Co-op. Bldg., Anna Salai,

   Chennai – 600 02.

 

4.The Manager,

   The LIC Housing Finance Ltd.,

   Registered & Corporate Office,

   Bombay Life Building, II Floor,

   45/47, Veer Nariman Road,

   Mumbai – 400 001.

 

5.The Manager,

   The LIC Housing Finance Ltd.,

   No.30/1A, Harrington Chamber Block C,

   II Floor, Abdul Razack 1^st Street Near Panagal Building,

   Saidapet,

   Chennai – 600 015.                                                                                                                            ..Opposite parties

Counsel for Complainant       : M/s. T. Shyamala Chandrasekar

For opposite parties 3 to 5    :  M/s.D. Sekar

For opposite party 1 & 2       :    Set exparte

DOCKET ORDER

 

          Heard through video conferencing. Memo filed by the complainant praying for withdrawl of the complaint.

          Memo recorded.

          In view of the memo filed by the complainant, the complainant is permitted to withdraw the complaint. Accordingly the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to cost.

 

                 Sd/-                                                                                                                                                                 Sd/-

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                                                                             S.TAMILVANAN    

           MEMBER                                                                                                                                                     PRESIDENT