Telangana

Mahbubnagar

CC/13/16

Kodavath Tejya S/o K. Puriya - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Managing Director, Andhra Pradesh State Seeds Development Corporation and others. - Opp.Party(s)

Sri M. Chennaiah Goud

28 Mar 2013

ORDER

                                  BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM AT MAHABUBNAGAR

Thursday, the 28^th day of March, 2013

 

                                                            Present:- Sri P. Sridhara Rao, B.Sc., LL.B., President

 Smt. D. Nirmala, B.Com., LL.B., Member

                                                                                                     C.C.No. 16  Of  2013

Between:

Kodavath Tejya S/o K. Puriya, age: 50 years, Occ: Agriculture R/o H.No.1-81, Pullagiri Kodavath thanda of Thimmajipet Mandal, Mahabubnagar District. 

                                                                                                … Complainant

And  

1. The Managing Director, Andhra Pradesh State Seeds Development Corporation   

    Ltd., 5-10-193, Hacca Bhavan, Hyderabad.

 

2. The Manager, Bisco Bio-Sciences Private Ltd., C 30, Bharani Complex, Minister  

    road, Secuderabad-500 003, A.P.

 

3. The Assistant Director of Agriculture, Bijinapally mandal, Mahabubnagar  

    District.

                                                                                                                   …Opposite Parties

 

This is a complaint filed under section 12 of C.P. Act, 1986 praying to direct the opposite parties to pay compensation, loss of crop Rs.1,50,000/- for Ac.3-00 Gt., Rs.20,000/- towards deficiency of service and for adopting unfair trade practice, Rs.20,000/- compensation for causing mental agony and Rs.5,000/- towards costs. 

 

 This C.C. coming on before us this day in the presence of  Sri M. Chennaiah Goud, Advocate, Mahabubnagar for the complainant, and the OP-2 being in person and the matter having stood over for consideration till this day, this Forum delivered the following:   

 

                                                                                                      O R D E R

          Counter of OP-2 not filed. OP-1 is though served with notice, but called absent. At this stage, the complainant filed a memo stating that the present matter is settled out of Court at the instance of village elders, as such the complaint can be dismissed as not pressed. The memo is accordingly recorded. In view of the memo filed, the complaint is dismissed as not pressed. No costs.  

   Pronounced by us in the open Forum, on this the 28^th day of March, 2013.