West Bengal

Kolkata-I(North)

CC/162/2017

Sri Amit Ghosh - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Managing Director, Alchemist Infra Realty Ltd. and another - Opp.Party(s)

Rajesh Biswas and 2 others

17 Jan 2018

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kolkata - I (North)
8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.
Web-site - confonet.nic.in
 
Complaint Case No. CC/162/2017
 
1. Sri Amit Ghosh
S/o Tapan Ghosh, Vill. - Khariberia, P.O. - Bishnupur, Pin - 743503.
South 24 Parganas
West Bengal
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Managing Director, Alchemist Infra Realty Ltd. and another
723, DLF Tower A, Jasola, District Centre, New Delhi.
2. Mr. Karandeep Singh
The Chairman of Alchemist Infra Realty Ltd., HM Building, 15, Ganesh Chandra Avenue, 4th Floor, P.O. - Lenin, P.S. - Hare Street, Kolkata - 700013.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sambhunath Chatterjee PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Sk. Abul Answar MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 17 Jan 2018
Final Order / Judgement

Date of Filing : 05/05/2017

Order No.  10  dt. 17/01/2018

              The case of the complainant in brief is that the complainant invested an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- for allotment of proportionate undivided share of land and  development charges as per allotment no AIRL/RXX0100110dt 07.09.2012 with M/s Alchemist Infra Realty Ltd,Golpark,8A Ballygaunge Terrace, Kolkata-700020 by acquiring an undivided portion of land measuring an area of 1762.20 kanal at Behanta & Tilla, tehsil kolarash, Dist Shivpuri, Madhya Pradesh .  The estimated value of the said undivided share of land after development is expected to be not less than rs 10,00,000/- After expiry of the said time period the complainant repeatedly requested the o.p. for the land after depositing the Certificate of Property on 08.07.2015 at Amtala Branch of the company.  Complainant thereafter caused to issue legal notice on 07.03.2017 asking refund of the matured value with interest of @18% p.a   from due date up to the date of full realization within 15 days. But such attempt had also been proved to be a fruitless effort. Finding no other alternative complainant filed this case praying for direction upon the o.ps for payment of Rs 10,00,000/-along with compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- for harassment and mental agony with litigation cost.

            PR & TR showed that notice had not been served upon the ops. Complainant took initiative for issuing notice through paper publication in the daily news paper the Telegraph. But the ops did not contest this case by filing w/v and as such, the case has been proceeded ex-parte against the o.ps.           

   On the basis of the pleadings of the complainant following points are to be decided:-

  1. Whether there was any deficiency in service/utp on the part of the o.ps?
  2. Whether the complainant will be entitled to get any relief as prayed for?

Decision with reasons :-

            All the points are taken up together for the sake of brevity and avoidance of repetition of facts.           

          Considering the submissions of the complainant and on perusal of the materials on record it is evident that the complainant invested an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- for allotment of proportionate undivided share of land with its  development as per allotment no AIRL/RXX0100110dt07.09.2012 with the op-1 .The estimated value of the said undivided share of land as decided by the company after development is to be not less than Rs 10,00,000/- After expiry of the said time period the complainant repeatedly requested the o.p. for the land after depositing the Certificate of Property on 08.07.2015 . 

            In order to prove the case the complainant sworn an affidavit of evidence in support of the contention of the complaint and filed the documents in support of his claim including the photocopy of  the Certificate of Property of Rs10,00,000/- issued by the o.p. Due to unchallenged testimony of the complaint there is no scope to disbelieve the submission of the complainant and therefore it should be accepted and necessary order is to be passed accordingly. Even after of expiry of the said time period the assured amount had not been paid by the o.p. in spite of repeated request by the complainant. On the basis of the said evidences on record and since no challenge has been made by o.p. to controvert the demand of the complainant we, therefore, have no other alternative but to accept the case of the complainant. There was failure of assurance as well as deficiency in service on the part of the o.p.s. Therefore, complainant is entitled to get relief. Thus the case is disposed of accordingly.

Hence, it is ordered

            that the case no. CC/162/2017 is allowed ex-parte with cost against the o.ps. The o.ps are jointly and/or severally directed to pay a sum of Rs.10,00,000/-(Rupees Ten Lakh) only to the complainant along with compensation of Rs.70,000/- (Rupees seventy Thousand) only for harassment and mental agony and litigation cost of Rs.5,000/-(Rupees five thousand) only within 30 days from the date of communication of this order, i.d. an interest @ 10% p.a. shall accrue over the entire sum due to the credit of the complainant till full realization.

            Supply certified copy of this order to the parties free of cost.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sambhunath Chatterjee]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sk. Abul Answar]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.