Karnataka

Gadag

CC/354/2008

Maheshswamy A Aralemath - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Managing Director, AIC Of India - Opp.Party(s)

B.V.Neerloti

24 Aug 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, GADAG
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONBehind Tahsildar Office, Basaveshwar Nagar, GADAG
 
Complaint Case No. CC/354/2008
( Date of Filing : 02 Jul 2008 )
 
1. Maheshswamy A Aralemath
R/at: Abbigeri, Tq: Ron, Dist: Gadag.
Gadag
Karnataka
2. Rudrappa Veerappa Basalapur
R/at: Abbigeri, Tq: Ron, Dist: Gadag.
Gadag
Karnataka
3. Basawwa W/o Veerabasappa Talakal
R/at: Abbigeri, Tq: Ron, Dist: Gadag.
Gadag
Karnataka
4. Virupaxappa Sangappa Talikoti
R/at: Abbigeri, Tq: Ron, Dist: Gadag.
Gadag
Karnataka
5. (1)Yamanoorsab (2) Raimansab (3) Husainbi S/o Fakeersab Pinjar LRs mother Allabi
R/at: Abbigeri, Tq: Ron, Dist: Gadag.
Gadag
Karnataka
6. Shivappa Bailappa Needagundi
R/at: Abbigeri, Tq: Ron, Dist: Gadag.
Gadag
Karnataka
7. Rudragouda Shivanagouda Patil, his Power of Attorney holder Somanagouda Rudragouda Patil
R/at: Abbigeri, Tq: Ron, Dist: Gadag.
Gadag
Karnataka
8. Sharanappagouda Siddanagouda Patil
R/at: Abbigeri, Tq: Ron, Dist: Gadag.
Gadag
Karnataka
9. Channawwa W/o Siddanagouda Patil, her Power of Attorney holder Sharanappagouda Siddanagouda Patil
R/at: Abbigeri, Tq: Ron, Dist: Gadag.
Gadag
Karnataka
10. Somappa Basappa Harlapur
R/at: Abbigeri, Tq: Ron, Dist: Gadag.
Gadag
Karnataka
11. Drakshayini W/o Somappa Harlapur
R/at: Abbigeri, Tq: Ron, Dist: Gadag.
Gadag
Karnataka
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Managing Director, AIC Of India
Shankarnarayana Building No.25, M.G.Road, Bangalore
Bangalore
Karnataka
2. The Manager, Vyasaya Seva Sahakari Bank Ltd
R/at: Abbigeri, Tq: Ron, Dist: Gadag.
Gadag
Karnataka
3. The State of Karnataka, Rep by Deputy Commissioner
Gadag
Gadag
Karnataka
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. D.Y Basapur PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Sri Raju Namadev Metri MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Smt. Yashoda Bhaskar Patil MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 24 Aug 2022
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Behind Tahasildar Office, Basaveshwar Nagar, GADAG

 
 

 

CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO.354/2008

DISPOSED ON 24th DAY OF AUGUST 2022

 

BEFORE:

 

 

HON'BLE MR. D.Y. BASAPUR, B.Com, L.L.B(Spl.,)

 

                                                                         PRESIDENT    

                                                 

 

HON'BLE Mrs. YASHODA BHASKAR PATIL,

                                                         B.Com, L.L.B(Spl.,) M.Ed.,

                                                                   WOMAN MEMBER             

                                               

HON'BLE Mr. RAJU. N. METRI, B.Com, L.L.B(Spl.,)

                                                                            MEMBER

                                                                   

 

 

Complainants     :-

1.

 

 

 

2.

 

 

3.

 

 

4.

 

 

 

5.

 

 

 

 

6.

 

 

7.

 

 

 

 

8.

 

 

9.

 

 

9 a)

 

 

 

 

10.

 

 

11.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maheshswami Anandswami Aralemath

Age:60 Yrs, Occ:Agril.

 

Rudrappa Veerappa Basalapur

Age:65 Yrs, Occ:Agril.

 

Basavva W/o Veerabasappa Talakal

Age:60 Yrs, Occ:Housewife.

 

Virupakashappa Sangappa Talikoti

Age:60 Yrs, Occ:Agril.

 

1) Yamanursab 2) Remanasab
3) Husainsab S/o Fakkirsab Pinjar sice represented by his natural Guardian Mother Allabi Age:48 Yrs, Occ:Housewife.

 

Shivappa Bailappa Nidagundi

Age:40 Yrs, Occ:Agril

 

Rudragouda Shivanagouda Patil

(Dead) his LRs.

Somanagouda Rudragouda Patil

Age:41 Yrs, Occ:Agril.

 

Sharanagouda Siddangouda Patil

Age:45 Occ:Agril.

 

Channavva W/o Siddangouda Patil

Since dead reptd. By her LR.

 

Sharanagouda Siddangouda Patil

Age:62 Yrs, Occ:Agril.

 

 

 

Somappa Basappa Harlapur

Age:58 Yrs, Occ:Agril.

 

Drakshayini W/o Somappa Harlapur

Age:50 Yrs, Occ:Housewife.

 

All complainants are Occ:Agril

R/o Abbigeri Tq:Ron Dist:Gadag.

 

 

 

(Rep. by Sri.B.V.Neeraloti, Adv.)

V/s

Respondents    :-

 

 

 

 

 

1.





 

2.

 

 

 

 

 

3.

Managing Director,

Indian Agricultural Insurance Company,

Regional Office, Shankarnarayan Building, No.25, M.G.Road, Bangalore – 560 001.

 

(Rep. by Sri.M.S.Sudi, Advocate)

 

The Manager,

Vyavasaya Seva Sahakari Bank,

R/o: Abbigeri Tq: Ron Dist: Gadag.

      

      (Absent)

 

The Government of Karnataka,

Through its District Commissioner,

Gadag District, Gadag

 

 (Rep. by DGP, Gadag)

 

 

JUDGEMENT

JUDGEMENT DELIVERED BY SRI. D.Y. BASAPUR, PRESIDENT

          The complainants have filed the complaint U/Sec.12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 for recovery crop loan insurance amount of Rs.1,20,105/- as shown in schedule para-4 with interest @ 12% p.a, towards mental agony of Rs.5,000/- each and cost of the proceedings.

           1.  The brief facts of the complaint are as under:

          Complainants are resident of  Abbigeri village of Ron Taluk Dist:Gadag.  They have grown Onion and Green-gram for the year 2006-07 in Kharif season and paid the premium amount as shown in the schedule through OP No.2. Due to shortage of rain, complainants have suffered loss.  Inspite of repeated request to Ops, they did not settle the claim.  So, Ops have committed the deficiency of service.  Hence, filed this complaint.

          2.       In pursuance of notice, OP No.1 appeared through counsel, OP No.3 appeared through DGP and Op No.2 remained absent. Op No.1 & 2 filed written version. 

          3.       The brief facts of written version filed by OP No.1 are as under:

          OP No.1 denied the various allegations and contended that, complainants have claimed for the loss of their crop Onion and Green-gram during the year 2006-07 for Kharif seasons.   As per the yield data furnished by the Director of Economics and Statistics, there was no shortfall. Hence, claim is not settled.  So, there is no deficiency of service. Hence, prays for dismissal of the complaint.

          4. The brief facts of  written version filed by OP No.3 are as under:

          OP No.3 denied the various allegations and contended that, complainants have claimed for the loss of their crop during the Kharif season 2006-07.  Complainants are not a consumer; this Op has only supervising power over the other Ops.  So, there is no deficiency of service. Hence, prays for dismissal of the complaint.

          5. After hearing, my predecessor passed common judgment on 07.10.2008, complaint is partly allowed and awarded compensation.  OP No.1 has challenged the judgment in Appeal No.735/2009 before the Hon’ble Karnataka State Consumer Disputes    Redressal   Commission,   Bengaluru,   the   same   came  to  be dismissed. OP No.1 preferred R.P.No.2876/09 before Hon’ble the National Commission, same came to be allowed  on 12.08.2009 and remanded for fresh disposal.

          6.       After receipt of the records, notice issued to the parties.  After hearing, my predecessor again passed common judgment on 28.05.2010 and awarded compensation.  Being aggrieved by the judgment, OP No.1 again preferred an appeal in Appeal No.2749/10 before the Hon’ble State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bengaluru and the same came to be allowed on 28.10.2010 and remanded for fresh disposal.

 

7. After receipt of the records, notice issued to the parties.  After hearing, my predecessor again passed common judgment on 21.05.2016 and awarded compensation.  Being aggrieved by the judgment, OP No.1 again preferred an appeal in Appeal No.1440/16 before the Hon’ble State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bengaluru and the same came to be allowed on 12.06.2020 and remanded for fresh disposal.

          8. After receipt of the records, notice issued to the parties. Complainant
No. 9 is reported as dead and LRs are  brought on record.  Complainant No.1 to 5 ,7 to 11 and 9 (a) and examined as PW-1 to 11 and got marked documents as Ex.C-1 to Ex.C-83.  DGP appeared for Op No.3 and filed the written version. Notice served to Op No.1 & 2 they are remained absent and not chosen to file their affidavit evidence.

9.       No argument advanced on both side, as no presentation made out.

          10.     The points for consideration to us are as under:

  1. Whether the complainants prove that, there is a deficiency in service by the OPs?

 

  1. Whether the complainants prove that, they are          

entitled for relief?

 

  1. What Order?

       11.   Our findings on the above points are as under:

               Point No. 1:  Negative.

               Point No. 2:  Negative

               Point No. 3:  As per the final Order

R E A S O N S

              12.   Point No.1 & 2:- The points are taken together to avoid the repetition of facts.

            13.   On careful perusal of the materials placed before us, case remanded for fresh disposal with a direction take affidavit evidence of all complainants. PW-1 to PW-11 filed affidavits and reiterated contents of complaint. PW-1 to  PW-11 have stated that,  Complainants are resident of  Abbigeri village of Ron Taluk Dist:Gadag.  They have grown Onion and Green-gram for the year 2006-07 in Kharif season and paid the premium amount as shown in the schedule through OP No.2. Due to shortage of rain, complainants have suffered loss.  Inspite of repeated request to Ops, they did not settle the claim.  So, Ops have committed the deficiency of service. 

14. Ex.C-1 to Ex.C-83 RTCs and other documents are not disputing by the Ops. Main contention of Op No.1 is that there was a no shortfall as per yield data report issued by statistical department.. So, there is no shortfall for the year 2006-07 of Green-Gram for Kharif season.

15. Even no cause of action arose to file this complaint as there is no deficiency of service committed by Ops. Complainants claiming compensation for the loss of crops for the year 2006-07 and complaint filed after 2 years in the year 2008. Even complaint is barred by limitation. Without proving the case with affidavit evidence and documents, complainants are not entitled the relief. Mere allegation made in the complaint without producing documentary evidence to show that there is a shortfall, they cannot be entitled the reliefs.

          16.     For the above, complainants have failed to prove that OPs have committed deficiency of service and they are entitled for the relief.   Accordingly, we answer Point No.1 and 2 in the Negative.         

             17.  POINT NO. 3: In the result, we pass the following:

//O R D E R//

              The complaint filed U/Sec.12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is dismissed.No order as to costs.

 

Amount transferred from State Commission, deposited by OP No.1 is ordered to return to OP No.1 after appeal period.

            

Office is directed to send the copies of this order to the parties free of cost.

            (Dictated to the Stenographer, transcribed by him, corrected and then pronounced by me in the Open Court on this 24th  day of August- 2022)

           

           (Shri Raju N. Metri)      (Shri. D.Y. Basapur)   (Smt.Yashoda Bhaskar. Patil)

                MEMBER                  PRESIDENT              WOMAN MEMBER

 

 

-: ANNEXURE :-

EVIDENCE ON BEHALF OF COMPLAINANT/S:

PW-1 : Maheshswami S/o Anandswami Aralemath

PW-2 : Rudrappa S/o Veerappa Basalapur.

PW-3 :Basavva W/o Veerbasappa Talakal

PW-4 : Veerpakshappa S/o Sangappa Talikoti

PW-5 : Allabi W/o Fakirsab Pinjar.

PW-6: Somanagouda S/o Shivanagouda Patil

PW-7 : Sharanappagouda Siddangouda Patil

PW-8: Sharanappagouda S/o Siddangouda Patil

PW-9: Somappa Basappa Harlapur

PW-10 : Drakshayini W/o Somappa Harlapur.

 

DOCUMENTS ON BEHALF OF COMPLAINANT/S

Ex.C-1: Bank receipt.

Ex.C-2:  Form No.24

Ex.C-3: Certificate.

Ex.C-4 : Crop certificate issued by village accountant.

Ex.C-5 : Proposal form.

Ex.C-6 : RTC.

Ex.C-7 : Bank receipt.

Ex.C-8 : Form No.24

Ex.C-9 : Certificate.

Ex.C-10 : Crop certificate issued by village accountant.

Ex.C-11: Proposal form.

Ex.C-12 : RTC

Ex.C-13 : Form No.24

Ex.C-14 : Crop certificate issued by village accountant.

Ex.C-15 : Proposal form.

Ex.C-16 : RTC.

Ex.C-17 : Bank receipt.

Ex.C-18 : Crop certificate issued by village accountant.

Ex.C-19: Form No.8 A

Ex.C-20 : Proposal form.

Ex.C-21 : RTC.

Ex.C-22 : Form No.8 A

Ex.C-23 : Crop certificate issued by village accountant.

Ex.C-24 : Proposal form.

Ex.C-25 & 26 : RTCs.

Ex.C-27 : Certificate.

Ex.C-28 : Form No.8 A

Ex.C-29 : Proposal form.

Ex.C-30 : Crop certificate issued by village accountant.

Ex.C-31 & 32 : RTCs.

Ex.C-33: Form No.8 A

Ex.C-34 : Crop certificate issued by village accountant.

Ex.C-35 : Proposal form.

Ex.C-36 & 37 :RTC’s

 Ex.C-38: Form No.8 A

Ex.C-39 : Crop certificate issued by village accountant.

Ex.C-40 & 41: Proposal form.

Ex.C-42 : RTC.

Ex.C-43 to 45 : Bank receipts.

Ex.C-46 : Crop certificate issued by village accountant.

Ex.C-47 : Proposal form.

Ex.C-48 : RTC.

Ex.C-49 : Form No.8 A

Ex.C-50: Crop certificate issued by village accountant.

Ex.C-51& 52: Proposal form.

Ex.C-53 & 54 : RTC’s

Ex.C-55 : Form No.8 A

Ex.C-56 : Crop certificate issued by village accountant.

Ex.C-57 : Proposal form.

Ex.C-58 : RTC.

Ex.C-59 : Form No.8 A

Ex.C-60 : Crop certificate issued by village accountant.

Ex.C-61 : Proposal form.

Ex.C-62 : RTC

Ex.C-63 : Total Death letter (bond paper)

Ex.C-64 : Form No.8 A

Ex.C-65 : Crop certificate issued by village accountant.

Ex.C-66 : Proposal form.

Ex.C-67 : RTC.

Ex.C-68 : Bank receipt.

Ex.C-69 : Form No.24.

Ex.C-70 : Crop certificate issued by village accountant.

Ex.C-71 & 72: Proposal form.

Ex.C-73: Bank receipt.

Ex.C-74 : Form No.24.

Ex.C-75 : Crop certificate issued by village accountant.

Ex.C-76 to 78 : Proposal form.

Ex.C-79 :D.C. Gadag circular dtd:04.08.2007.

Ex.C-80 : Letter from Dist. Statistical department Gadag dtd:20.10.2012.

Ex.C-81 : Letter from Dist. Statistical department Gadag dtd:20.10.2012.

Ex.C-82 : LRs. Certificate.

Ex.C-83 : Death certificate.

 

EVIDENCE ON BEHALF OF OPs:

           -NIL-

  

DOCUMENTS ON BEHALF OF OPs:

               -NIL-

 

 

 

 

 

        (Shri Raju N. Metri)    (Shri. D.Y. Basapur)   (Smt.Yashoda Bhaskar. Patil)

              MEMBER                  PRESIDENT            WOMAN MEMBER

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. D.Y Basapur]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri Raju Namadev Metri]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Smt. Yashoda Bhaskar Patil]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.