Tamil Nadu

South Chennai

CC/179/2015

Mr.P.Baskar - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Managing Directers, Panasonic India Corparate Office - Opp.Party(s)

Party in Persion

26 Oct 2018

ORDER

                                                                                Date of Filing  : 16.04.2015                                        Date of Order  : 26.10.2018

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (SOUTH)

@ 2^ND Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3.

 

PRESENT: THIRU. M. MONY, B.Sc., L.L.B, M.L.                : PRESIDENT

                 TMT. K. AMALA, M.A., L.L.B.                           :  MEMBER-I

   

C.C. No.179/2015

DATED THIS FRIDAY THE 26^TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2018

Mr. P. Baskar,

S/o. Mr. L. Pandu Rangen,

No.6, Malliga Nagar,

Zamin Pallavaram,

Chennai – 600 043.                                                      .. Complainant.

                                                          ..Versus..

     

1. The Managing Directors,

Panasonic India Corporate Office,

No.135, 1^st Floor, Nagi Reddy Thottam,

Thiru. Vi. Ka. Industrial Estate,

Ekkattuthangal,

Chennai – 600 032.

 

2. The Managing Directors,

Panasonic Customer Care,

D-172 Okhla Industrial Area,

Phase – I, New Delhi – 110 020.

 

3. The Managing Director,

Maniac Stores,

Plot No.442 – Sec.16 Gandhi Nagar,

Gujarat – 382 016.  

 

4. The Managing Director,

C/o. Deprosys,

Panasonic Service Centre,

No.3, Anandan Street,

North Usman Road,

T. Nagar,

Chennai – 600 017                                               .. Opposite parties.

 

For the complainant                     : Party in person

Counsel for the opposite parties : Exparte

                                                           

ORDER

THIRU. M. MONY, PRESIDENT

 

This complaint has been filed by the complainant against the opposite parties under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 praying to take back the defective complaint mentioned mobile phone and refund a sum of Rs.8,249/- being the cost price of the mobile and to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/- towards compensation for the mental agony with cost of Rs.5,000/- to the complainant.

 

On verification of records, the complainant has not filed Proof Affidavit to prove the contentions in the complaint and Proof Affidavit of the complainant is closed.

Hence, this case is dismissed for default.

 

MEMBER –I                                                                       PRESIDENT