Tamil Nadu

Thiruvallur

RBT/CC/134/2022

J.Ashish,S/o.G.Joseph - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager,Sangam Cinemas, - Opp.Party(s)

Party in Person

12 Sep 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
THIRUVALLUR
No.1-D, C.V.NAIDU SALAI, 1st CROSS STREET,
THIRUVALLUR-602 001
 
Complaint Case No. RBT/CC/134/2022
 
1. J.Ashish,S/o.G.Joseph
ch-10
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Manager,Sangam Cinemas,
Kilpauk ch-10
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI, M.A.,M.L.,Ph.D(Law) PRESIDENT
  THIRU.P.MURUGAN, M.Com, ICWA (Inter), B.L., MEMBER
  THIRU.J.JAYASHANKAR, B.A.,B.L., MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Party in Person , Advocate for the Complainant 1
 M/s Chandrakanthan - OP, Advocate for the Opp. Party 1
Dated : 12 Sep 2022
Final Order / Judgement

                                                                                                                       
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
THIRUVALLUR

 BEFORE  TMT. Dr.S.M. LATHA MAHESWARI, M.A.,M.L, Ph.D (Law)                                     .…. PRESIDENT
                 THIRU.J.JAYASHANKAR, B.A.,B.L.,                                                                               .....MEMBER-I
                 THIRU P.MURUGAN, M.Com., ICWA(Inter)., B.L.,                                                   ….. MEMBER-II

CC. No.134/2022
THIS MONDAY, THE 12th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022

Mr.J.Ashish, S/o.Joseph,
No.21/22, Anna Street,
Thanigachalam Nagar, E-Block,
Chennai -600 110.                                                                                                             ....Complainant.
                                                                                       //Vs//
The Manager,
Sangam Cinemas,
No.870, Poonamallee High Road,
Kilpauk, Chennai -600 010.                                                                                       ....Opposite party.

Counsel for the complainant                                                 :           Party in Person.
Counsel for the opposite party                                             :           M/s.Chandrakanthan, Advocate.

ORDER
PRONOUNCED BY TMT. Dr.S.M. LATHA MAHESWARI,   PRESIDENT.

               The complaint was filed by the complainant U/S 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986 alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party in collecting excess amount towards parking charges of his vehicle by the opposite party along with a prayer to direct the opposite party to return the excess parking charges of Rs.40/- and to pay a sum of Rs.25,000/- towards compensation for the mental agony along with cost and incidental expenses to the complainant.
No representation for complainant. No Proof affidavit was also filed by the complainant Sufficient opportunities given.  Hence, this commission is of the view that there is no purpose in keeping the complaint on file. Hence this complaint is dismissed for non prosecution. No cost.

This order was pronounced by us in the open Commission on this 12th September 2022. 

Sd/-                                                                    Sd/-                                                              Sd/-

MEMBER-II                                                 MEMBER-I                                                  PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 
 
[ TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI, M.A.,M.L.,Ph.D(Law)]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ THIRU.P.MURUGAN, M.Com, ICWA (Inter), B.L.,]
MEMBER
 
 
[ THIRU.J.JAYASHANKAR, B.A.,B.L.,]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.