Haryana

Karnal

CC/280/2022

Kanta Sharma - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager/Proprietor/Partner, Hanumant Indane - Opp.Party(s)

Sarvedeep Kaur

19 May 2022

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

 

                                                          Complaint No. 280 of 2022

                                                          Date of instt.18.05.2022

                                                          Date of Decision 19.05.2022

Kanta Sharma, (LPG consumer ID 7050045166) 1336, village Jundla, District Karnal-13036 (Haryana)

                                                 …….Complainant.

                                              Versus

 

1.     The Manager/proprietor/partner, Hanumant Indane (0000298868) Assandh road, village Jundla District Karnal, Haryana-132036, Telephone 01748-259149.

2.     Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. HO LPG CRM, Indian Oil Bhavan G-9 Ali Yavar Jung Marg, Bandra East Mumbai, Telephone 1800-2333-555.

3.     Debasish Nanda, Executive Director (Gas), Indian Oil Scope Complex, core-22, Institutional Area, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110003. Telephone 011-24360137.

                                                                    …..Opposite Parties.

 

        Complaint u/s 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019

 

Before   Sh. Jaswant Singh……President.       

      Sh.Vineet Kaushik ………..Member

      Dr. Rekha Chaudhary……Member

 

 Present: Ms. Sarvedeep Kaur, counsel for the complainant.

                                        

                (Jaswant Singh President)

ORDER:                    

 

                Complaint presented today. It be checked and registered.

 

                        The complainant has filed the present complaint u/s 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 against the opposite parties (hereinafter referred to as ‘OP’) on the averments that on 05.05.2022   she booked a gas cylinder and at that time cost of the cylinder was Rs.956/- , but at the time of delivery of the said cylinder the OPs have charged Rs.1006/- instead of Rs.950/-. In this way there is deficiency in service on the part of the OPs.  Hence this complaint.

2.             Arguments heard on the point of admissibility.

3.             Complainant has alleged that at the time of booking the cost of the cylinder was Rs.956/-, but  at the time of delivery, OPs have charged Rs.1006/-. Complainant has not placed on record any proof to prove that at the time of booking dated 05.05.2022 the cost of cylinder was Rs.956/-. OPs have charged Rs.1006/- and in this regard OPs have issued invoice. There is nothing on the file to prove the version of the complainant. Hence complaint is devoid of any merits and same deserves to be dismissed and same is hereby dismissed at the stage of admission. Party concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Announced
Dated: 19.05.2022

                                                                 President,

                                                   District Consumer Disputes

                                                   Redressal Commission, Karnal.

 

       

                (Vineet Kaushik)        (Dr. Rekha Chaudhary)      

                      Member                        Member