Tamil Nadu

South Chennai

CC/468/2014

M/s.Balakrishnan Elangovan - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager , Matrix Cellular International Services Pvt ltd - Opp.Party(s)

M/s.Rm.Subbiah

03 Jan 2019

ORDER

                                                                                Date of Filing  : 28.11.2014                                                                        

                                                                                Date of Order  : 03.01.2019

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (SOUTH)

@ 2^ND Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3.

 

PRESENT: THIRU. M. MONY, B.Sc., L.L.B, M.L.                    : PRESIDENT

TR. R. BASKARKUMARAVEL, B.Sc., L.L.M., BPT., PGDCLP., : MEMBER-II

   

C.C. No.468/2014

DATED THIS THURSDAY THE 03^RD DAY OF JANUARY 2019

Balakrishnan Elangovan,

A2, Krishna Heritage,

No.12, East Circular Road,

Mandavelipakkam,

Chennai – 600 028.                                                  .. Complainant.

                                                          ..Versus..       

1. The Manager – Sales,

Matrix Cellular International Services Pvt. Ltd.,

Seshaai, 2^nd Floor, No.4/606, First Main Road,

Nehru Nagar,

Rajaiv Gandhi Salai,

Kottivakkam,

Chennai – 600 041.    

 

2. Matrix Cellular International Services Pvt. Ltd.,

Rep. by its Managing Director or Authorised Person,

Head Office at:-

No.7, Khullar Farms,

Mandi Road, Mehrauli,

New Delhi – 110 030.                                           .. Opposite parties.

 

Counsel for the complainant                 : M/s. R.M. Subbiah

                                                                  & another

Counsel for the opposite parties 1 & 2 : M/s. Samuthira Vijayan

                                                           

ORDER

THIRU. M. MONY, PRESIDENT

 

This complaint has been filed by the complainant against the opposite parties under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 praying to pay a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- towards compensation for mental agony, hardship, deficiency in service and unfair trade practice and cost to the complainant.

Both parties and Counsels appeared in person and filed Joint Compromise Memo which is recorded. In view of the Joint Compromise Memo, this case is dismissed as settled out of the Forum.   Joint Compromise Memo form part of the order.

 

 

MEMBER-II                                                           PRESIDENT