Orissa

Jagatsinghapur

CC/47/2023

Meghamala Mohapatra - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager , Indusind Bank Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

Mr.C.Mishra

09 May 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION JAGATSINGHPUR
JAGATSINGHPUR
 
Complaint Case No. CC/47/2023
( Date of Filing : 09 Feb 2023 )
 
1. Meghamala Mohapatra
W/o Late Ashok Kumar Mohapatra, At- Kuamanga, PO- Gothina, PS- Raghunahpur, Dist- Jagatsinghpur
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Manager , Indusind Bank Ltd
At- Sahu Complex, IFFCO Square, Atharabanki, PO/PS- Paradeep, Dist- Jagatsinghpur- 754120
2. The Manager, Consumer Finance Division, Indusind Bank Ltd.,
Old No.115, 118, New No.34, G.N. Chetty Road, T. Nagar, Chennai- 600017
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. PRAVAT KUMAR PADHI PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. MADHUSMITA SWAIN MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 Mr. U.C. Sethi & Associates, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
Dated : 09 May 2024
Final Order / Judgement

                                                                                                C.C. No.47/2023

 

Meghamala Mohapatra,

W/o. Late Ashok Kumar Mohapatra,

At- Kuamanga,

P.O.- Gothina,

P.S.- Raghunahpur,

Dist.- Jagatsinghpur.……… Complainant

  1. The Manager, Indusind Bank Ltd.,

Paradeep Branch,

At- Sahu Complex,

IFFCO Square, Atharabanki,

P.O./P.S.- Paradeep,

Dist.- Jagatsinghpur- 754120.

  1. The Manager,

Consumer Finance Division,

Indusind Bank Ltd.,

Old No.115, 118, New No.34,

G.N. Chetty Road, T. Nagar,

Chennai- 600017. …..… Opposite parties

 

For Complainant………..Mr. C. Mishra & Associates

For Opposite Parties………..Mr. U.C. Sethi & Associates

 

Date of Hearing: 05.4.2024                   Date of Judgment: 09.5.2024

ORDER BY HON’BLE PRESIDENT- MR. P.K. PADHI:

                                                                                              JUDGMENT

            Complainant, the owner of the multiple vehicles has filed the present consumer complaint and C.C. No.230/2023 before this Commission. The counsel for the complainant submitted that owner of 2(two) vehicles is a consumer as defined U/s.2 (7) of Consumer Protection Act, 2019. On the other hand the counsel for opposite parties relied on the decision of the Hon’ble National Commission in the case of Sri Jasobant Nrayan Ram Vrs. The B.M., L&T Finance, wherein Hon’ble National Commission appellant (consumer) has not been able to show as to how purchase of 2(two) trucks does not fall within the meaning of commercial transaction. Even in that case the plea of the complainant was that another truck was lying ideal, which was not accepted by Hon’ble National Commission, but in the present case, the complainant has filed 2(two) cases for 2(two) vehicles as such we find no merit in the consumer complaint and complainant being owner of the multiple vehicles is not a consumer as such the consumer complaint is dismissed. No cost.  

            Pronounced in the open Commission on this 9th May,2024.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. PRAVAT KUMAR PADHI]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. MADHUSMITA SWAIN]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.