Kerala

Trissur

CC/07/906

Raju Vasudevan - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager,ICICi Bank - Opp.Party(s)

K.Govindankutty

04 Jun 2008

ORDER


CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
Ayyanthole , Thrissur
consumer case(CC) No. CC/07/906

Raju Vasudevan
...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

The Manager,ICICi Bank
...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:
1. Padmini Sudheesh 2. Rajani P.S.

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):
1. Raju Vasudevan

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
1. The Manager,ICICi Bank

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
1. K.Govindankutty

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):




Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

By Smt. Padmini Sudheesh, President The petitioner opened an account (A/c No.018005000291) in the institution of the opposite party in 2003. The institution has quite often and deliberately committed deficiency in its service by not willing to close his account when he wanted it. Though the petitioner had informed the Manager this deficiency, he had not yet taken any step to solve the problem. He submitted the application to close his account in the institution of the opposite party in June 2006. Then he rejected it by putting some unlawful conditions. 2.On 15/11/06 the petitioner submitted the Manager a printed application, which was dated on 31/10/06 regarding to repay his balance amount by closing his account and the extract of the minutes having the regulations of closing accounts in the Bank. He checked the application and the extract and handed over the petitioner a document about it which is a proof still remains in him. When he submitted that application he had a deposit of Rs.16,690.28 in his own account in the Bank. The opposite party has the liability and responsibility to close his account and refund him the amount in his account when he wanted to it. But when he approached the respondent, the respondent insulted and mocked him. Again, when he approached the respondent on 30/4/07, he found a greater reduction in his balance amount. When he asked he was informed that the opposite party was imposing the RCA charges on his balance amount every month. Lawyer notice sent. No reply. Hence this complaint. 3.Respondent is called absent and set exparte. 4.To prove the case the petitioner filed affidavit and 7 documents and are marked as exhibits P1 to P7. 5.According to the petitioner he is entitled to get an amount of Rs.16,690.28 which was there in the account when application is submitted for closing the account. He also prays to stop the account. There is no counter evidence. 6.So the petition is allowed and the respondent is directed to treat the account as closed on June 2006 onwards and also directed to pay Rs.16,690.28 (Rupees Sixteen thousand six hundred ninety and Paise twenty eight only). The petitioner is also entitled for Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two thousand only) as compensation and Rs.500/- (Rupees Five hundred only) as costs. Time for compliance one month. Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the open forum this the 4th day of June 2008.




......................Padmini Sudheesh
......................Rajani P.S.