Kerala

Palakkad

CC/10/2018

Shibu .S - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager - Opp.Party(s)

Maitheen M Pareeth

07 Feb 2018

ORDER

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PALAKKAD
Near District Panchayath Office, Palakkad - 678 001, Kerala
 
Complaint Case No. CC/10/2018
( Date of Filing : 19 Jan 2018 )
 
1. Shibu .S
S/o. Shanmughan, 10 192, Pulinirakode, Peruvembu , Palakkad - 678 531
Palakkad
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Manager
Muthoot Fincorp High Value Ltd., Opp. K.S.R.T.C , Palakkad.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. Shiny.P.R. PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. V.P.Anantha Narayanan MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 07 Feb 2018
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PALAKKAD

Dated this the 07th  day of February 2018 

Present  : Smt.Shiny.P.R,  President

             :  Smt.Suma.K.P, Member

             : Sri. V.P.Anantha Narayanan, Member         Date of Filing : 19/02/2018

 

      CC/10/2018

  •  

S/o Shanmughan,

10/192, Pulinirakkode,

  •  

Palakkad - 678531,:Complainant

(By Adv.Maitheen M Pareed)

                                                                 Vs

 

Muthoot Fin Corp High Value Ltd,
Opp.KSRTC, Palakkad.

Rep.by its Manager :

 

O R D E R

 

By Smt. Shiny.P.R, President

 Complaint is filed to get an order directing opposite party to return the 23.87 grams of gold and three blank cheques of South Indian Bank Peruvembu Branch which were given as security to business loan along with Rs.75,000/- as compensation  to the complainant.

Heard on admission.

On the perusal of the complaint it is found that the complainant availed a gold loan from the opposite parties. But no document is produced to show that the complainant has availed a gold loan from the opposite party.  Several chances were given for the production of documents. They were produced some documents which were not related to the gold loan taken by the complainant.  So we could not find any consumer- service provider relationship between the complainant and opposite party. In the above circumstances, we are of the view that the complaint is not maintainable before the Forum.

Hence complaint dismissed without going to the merits of the case.

 

          Pronounced in the open court on this the  07th day of February 2018.

                                                                  

                                                                                   Sd/-

                                                                                Shiny.P.R                                                                                

                       President

 

                          Sd/-

                      Suma.K.P

                       Member

 

                          Sd/-

          V.P.Anantha Narayanan

                        Member

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Shiny.P.R.]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. V.P.Anantha Narayanan]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.