Shafi filed a consumer case on 16 Aug 2008 against The Manager in the Kasaragod Consumer Court. The case no is C.C.125/06 and the judgment uploaded on 30 Nov -0001.
Kerala
Kasaragod
C.C.125/06
Shafi - Complainant(s)
Versus
The Manager - Opp.Party(s)
16 Aug 2008
ORDER
judgements Fort Road,Kasaragod consumer case(CC) No. C.C.125/06
Shafi
...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
The Manager
...........Respondent(s)
BEFORE:
1. K.T.Sidhiq 2. P.P.Shymaladevi 3. P.Ramadevi
Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):
1. Shafi
OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
1. The Manager
OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
ORDER
D.o.F:27/10/06 D.o.O:6/8/08 IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KASARAGOD CC.NO.125/06 Dated this, the 6th day of August 2008 PRESENT; SRI.K.T.SIDHIQ : PRESIDENT SMT.P.RAMADEVI :MEMBER SMT.P.P.SHYMALADEVI ;MEMBER Shafi, S/o Mohammed Haji, House No.4/321,Annapady, : Complainant Po.Shankarampady, Kasaragod. The Manager, National Insurance Co.Ltd, 3rd Floor, High lane Plaza, ; Opposite party M.G.Road,kasaragod. ORDER SRI.K.T.SIDHIQ ; PRESIDENT Complainant Shafi is the R.C owner of a Scorpio bearing Reg.No.KL-14/E 3573 having a seating capacity of 6+1(driver). The vehicle is duly insured with National Insurance Co.ltd. It met with an accident and sustained damages. Insurer intimated, surveyor appointed and assessed the damages to the tune of Rs.47960/-. But National Insurance Co.Ltd while settling the claim deducted a sum of Rs.12000/-. Hence the complaint alleging deficiency in service. 2. In reply the National Insurance Company contended that the insured has suppressed the actual seating capacity of 6+1 and insured the vehicle showing the seating capacity as 5+1. As there is a difference in premium the settlement is made on non-standard basis. Hence the deduction of Rs.12000/-. 3. Shafi filed affidavit in support of his claim and Exts.A1 to A6 were marked. Exts.B1 to B3 were marked on the side of National Insurance Co.Ltd. 4. The stand taken by National Insurance Co.Ltd is no way justifiable since the vehicle is insured not only according to the details submitted by the insured but also by physical verification and on perusing the R.C, permit etc of the vehicle. The registration number, engine number, chassis number, the year of manufacture, seating capacity etc are to be considered as entered in the Registration certificate and permit of the vehicle. In Ext.A2 photostat copy of R.C. book pertaining to the vehicle Kl-14/E 3573, the seating capacity is clearly shown as seven in all. So the entry in the insurance certificate without physically verifying the vehicle and the R.C particulars could not be regarded as a suppression of material facts. Shafi immediately noticing the defect has revised the policy showing the correct seating capacity by additionally paying just Rs.118/-. That apart the claim is for the damages sustained to the vehicle which has absolutely no connection with the seating capacity and National Insurance company has no case that at the relevant time of accident the vehicle was carrying passengers more than insured ie, 5+1. So there is no breach of policy conditions to afford a ground for National Insurance Company deviate from the actual loss assessed by surveyor. Hence we find deficiency in service on the part of National Insurance Co.Ltd in settling the claim of shafi on non-standard basis and the deduction of Rs.12,000/- from the amount assessed by the surveyor is unjustifiable. Therefore, we allow the complaint and the National Insurance Co.Ltd is directed to pay Rs. 12000/- to Shafi with interest @9% per annum from the date of complaint till payment along with a cost of Rs.2000/-. Time for compliance is limited to 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of the order. MEMBER MEMBER PRESIDENT Exts: A1-28/4/06-Copy of Estimate A2-Photocopy of R.C A3-Copy of Cheque A4-&A5-Copy of insurance certificates A6-Additional premium receipt B1-Settlement intimation voucher B2-14/8/06-Survey report B3-additional policy MEMBER MEMBER PRESIDENT eva/