Kerala

Palakkad

CC/58/2010

Rohini Enterprises - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager - Opp.Party(s)

13 May 2010

ORDER


CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMCivil Station, Palakkad - 678001, Kerala
CONSUMER CASE NO. 58 of 2010
1. Rohini Enterprises"Metro Building" Market Road Palakkad, represented by its Managing Partner, P.Sivadas ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. The ManagerFastt & Safe Transports (p) Ltd Manjakulam Road, Palakkad2. Deputy General ManagerFast & Safe Transports (P) Ltd Corporate Office:Veekay Towers T.A.B.Road,Kochi-18 ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 13 May 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM

Civil Station, Palakkad – 678001, Kerala


 

Dated this the 13th day of May, 2010


 

Present: Smt.Seena.H, President

Smt.Preetha.G.Nair, Member

Smt.Bhanumathi.A.K, Member


 

CC.No.58/2010


 

Rohini Enterprises

Metro Building

Market Road

Palakkad

Represented by its

Managing Partner

P.Sivadas - Complainant


 

Vs


 

1. The Manager,

Fast & Safe Transports (P) Ltd.

Manjakulam Road

Palakkad


 

2. The Deputy General Manager

Fast & Safe Transports (P) Ltd.

Corporate Office: Veekay Towers

T.A.B.Road

Kochi – 18 - Opposite parties


 

O R D E R


 

By Smt.Seena.H, President


 

Complaint coming up for hearing on admission, the forum deliver the following.


 

Heard the complainant. Complainant is the Managing Partner of Messrs.Rohini Enterprises, who are the pharmaceutical distributors. The case of the complainant is that he entrusted a case with the 1st opposite party containing

medicines to deliver it to their principal M/s.Glaxo Smithkline Pharmaceutical Ltd. Even though the consignment was sent on 15/04/09, the same was not delivered to the consignee till date. Hence the complaint.


 

On going through the complaint, it is understood that the service hired by the complainant is for commercial purpose. Since Consumer Protection Act specifically excludes service hired for commercial purpose from the purview of the Act, we are not in a position to admit the complaint.


 

Hence without going into the merits of the case, we dismiss the complaint with direction to approach appropriate forum for relief.


 

Pronounced in the open court on this the 13th day of May, 2010

Sd/-

Seena.H

President

Sd/-

Preetha.G.Nair,

Member

Sd/-

Bhanumathi.A.K,

Member


HONORABLE Smt.Bhanumathi.A.K, MemberHONORABLE Smt.Seena.H, PRESIDENTHONORABLE Smt.Preetha.G.Nair, Member