Telangana

Medak

CC/08/50

Patteshwar Phatak, S/o Chandrabahan Phatak,Aged: 27 Years. - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager - Opp.Party(s)

R. Prabhakar

08 Jun 2012

ORDER

CAUSE TITLE AND
JUDGEMENT
 
Complaint Case No. CC/08/50
 
1. Patteshwar Phatak, S/o Chandrabahan Phatak,Aged: 27 Years.
R/o Isnapur (V), Patancheru (m) , Dist: Medak.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Manager
M/S Eagle Metal Printers Pvt Ltd, Plot No. 4 phase III, IDA Pashamilaram, Patancheru (M), Dist: Medak.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. PATIL VITHAL RAO PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Smt. Meena Ramanathan MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT FORUM (UNDER CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986) MEDAK AT SANGAREDDY.

 

                   Present: Sri P.V.Subrahmanyam, B.A.B.L., President.

                                 Smt.U.Sunita, M.A., Lady Member

Sri Mekala Narsimha Reddy, M.A.LL.B.,                        P.G.D.C.P.L.,Male Member.

 

Monday, the 8th  day of June, 2009

 

CC.No.50  /2008

 

Between:

Patteshwar Phatak S/o Chandrabhan Phatak,

Aged 27 years, Occ: Nil,

R/o Isnapur village, Mandal Patancheru,

District Medak.

                                                                                      … Complainant

                   And

 1  The Manager,

M/s Eagle Metal Printers Pvt.Ltd.,

Plot No.4, Phase III, IDA Pasha Mailaram,

Mandal Patancheru, District Medak.

 

2.  The Asst.Provident Fund Commissioner,

Regional Office 12-1, Susheeram complex,

Patancheru town, District Medak -502 319.

 

                                                                                  … Opposite parties

 

Counsel for the Complainant :-  Sri R Prabhakar (Adv)

Counsel for the Opposite parties:- Sri B.Anjaiah (Adv)

 

O R D E R

 

                    Complainant and his advocate are called absent. No representation for complainant waited till 4.P.M. Representative of opposite party No.2 present with authorization letter to attend this forum. It is stated by him that the matter is already settled. Evidence affidavit of complainant is not filed despite granting several adjournments.  In the circumstances the complaint is dismissed. No costs.

 

    Sd/-                                      Sd/-                                         Sd/-

President                            Lady Member                          Male Member

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. PATIL VITHAL RAO]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Smt. Meena Ramanathan]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.