Kerala

Kollam

CC/192/2020

Deepa Sistas,aged 43 years, - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager, - Opp.Party(s)

Adv.M.P.SUGATHAN CHITTUMALA

04 Feb 2022

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum
Civil Station , Kollam-691013.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/192/2020
( Date of Filing : 03 Sep 2020 )
 
1. Deepa Sistas,aged 43 years,
W/o.Sri.Sistas,Deepalayam,Vadakkumthala.P.O,Karunagappally Taluk,Kollam District.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Manager,
Kerala State Cooperative Bank(Previous District Cooperative Bank), Karunagappally.P.O, Kollam District.
2. The Deputy General Manager,
Kerala State Cooperative Bank,District Office,Chinnakkada,Kollam.P.O,Pin-691001.
3. The Sahakarana Sangam Registrar,
Kerala State Cooperative Bank Registrar,Thiruvanathapuram.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. SANDHYA RANI.S MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. STANLY HAROLD MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 04 Feb 2022
Final Order / Judgement

 

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOLLAM

DATED THIS THE 4th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022

Present: -      Sri.E.M.Muhammed Ibrahim, B.A, LLM. President

Smt.S.Sandhya   Rani. Bsc, LLB ,Member

           Sri.Stanly Harold, B.A.LLB, Member

CC.No.192/2020

    Deepa Sistas,

    Deepalayam, Vadakumthala P.O.,

    Karunagappally

    Kollam District.

    (By Adv.M.P.Sugathan Chittumala)              :           Complainant

V/S

  1. The Manager,

Kerala State Co-operative Bank,

Karunagapally Branch,Karunagapally P.O.,

Kollam District.                                           :                Opposite parties

(By Adv. P.N.Dilardeep)

2.       2.   The Deputy General Manager,

     Kerala State Co-operative Bank,

                 District Office, Chinnakkada

                 Kollam P.O. Pin 691 001.

  (By Adv. P.N.Dilardeep)

3.         3. The SahakaranaSangam Registrar,

                 Kerala State Co-operative Bank Registrar,

                 Thiruvananthapuram.

ORDER

Sri. E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM , B.A, LLM,President

          Complainant absent.  No representation.  Opposite parties 1 to 3 represented.  Complainant’s Advocate SugathanChittumala submits that he has no instruction.  In the circumstances we are inclined to hold that the complainant has no interest in conducting the case.  The complainant has also not produced any reliable documentary evidence to substantiate any deficiency in service or any unfair trade practice by opposite parties 1 to 3.

          In the result complaint stands dismissed.

          No costs.

Dated this the 4th day of February 2022.

E.M .MUHAMMED IBRAHIM:Sd/-

       S.SANDHYA RANI:Sd/-

                                                                          STANLY HAROLD:

            Forwarded/by Order

Senior superintendent

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SANDHYA RANI.S]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. STANLY HAROLD]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.