Tamil Nadu

Thiruvallur

RBT/CC/94/2022

S.Kaliyaraju S/o.Srinvasan - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager Union Bank - Opp.Party(s)

Party in Person

29 Nov 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
THIRUVALLUR
No.1-D, C.V.NAIDU SALAI, 1st CROSS STREET,
THIRUVALLUR-602 001
 
Complaint Case No. RBT/CC/94/2022
 
1. S.Kaliyaraju S/o.Srinvasan
kodungaiyur ch-18
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Manager Union Bank
moolakadai ch-60
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI, M.A.,M.L.,Ph.D(Law) PRESIDENT
  THIRU.J.JAYASHANKAR, B.A.,B.L., MEMBER
  THIRU.P.MURUGAN, M.Com, ICWA (Inter), B.L., MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Party in Person , Advocate for the Complainant 1
 Set Exparte - OP, Advocate for the Opp. Party 1
Dated : 29 Nov 2022
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
THIRUVALLUR

 BEFORE  TMT. Dr.S.M. LATHA MAHESWARI, M.A.,M.L, Ph.D (Law)                 .…. PRESIDENT
                 THIRU.J.JAYASHANKAR. B.A., B.L.,                                                           …..MEMBER-I
                 THIRU P.MURUGAN, M.Com., ICWA(Inter)., B.L.,                                 ….. MEMBER-II

CC. No.94/2022
THIS TUESDAY, THE 29th DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022

Mr.S.Kaliyaraju, S/o.Srinivasan,
No.1/300, 18th Street,
Muthamizh Nagar,
Kodungaiyur post. Chennai – 600 018.                                                                     ....Complainant.
                                                                                       //Vs//
The Manager,
Union Bank, Madhavaram Branch,
G.N.T.Road, Moolakadai, Chennai 600 060.                                                         ....Opposite party.
 
ORDER
PRONOUNCED BY TMT. Dr. S.M. LATHA MAHESWARI,   PRESIDENT.

               The complaint was filed by the complainant U/S 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986 alleging deficiency in service against the opposite party in debiting a sum of Rs.59/- without the permission of the complainant along with a prayer to direct the opposite party to pay a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- towards compensation for the mental agony and hardship caused to the complainant. 
No representation for the complainant.  Notice of transfer served on the complainant.  Inspite of sufficient opportunities provided by this commission, no proof affidavit was filed.   Hence, this commission is of the view that no purpose in keeping the complaint on file.  Hence the consumer complaint is dismissed for non prosecution.  No cost.
This order was pronounced by us in the open Commission on this 29th November 2022. 

Sd/-                                                     Sd/-                                                           Sd/-
MEMBER-II                                     MEMBER-I                                          PRESIDENT

 
 
[ TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI, M.A.,M.L.,Ph.D(Law)]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ THIRU.J.JAYASHANKAR, B.A.,B.L.,]
MEMBER
 
 
[ THIRU.P.MURUGAN, M.Com, ICWA (Inter), B.L.,]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.