West Bengal

Kolkata-I(North)

MA/48/2024

Subrata Mondal - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager, The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

15 Apr 2024

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kolkata - I (North)
8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.
Web-site - confonet.nic.in
 
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/48/2024
( Date of Filing : 16 Feb 2024 )
In
Complaint Case No. CC/17/2022
 
1. Subrata Mondal
S/o Sri Mohan Mondal, Proprietor of M/S. SUBRATA MONDAL, Govt. Licenced Contractor of Vill. & P.O. - Harishpur, P.S. -Basirhat, Dist. 24 Parganas (N), Pin - 743412.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. The Manager, The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.
Claim Service Centre, Regional Office, Office at 2nd Floor, 4, Lyons Range, P.S. - Hare Street, Kolkata - 700001.
2. The Branch Manager, The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.
Basirhat Branch, Office at Itinda Road, Beltala (Near Balaka Club), Basirhat, Dist. North 24 Parganas,Pin - 743411, P.S. - Basirhat.
3. WBSEDCL, Barasat RE Project (Proforma Opposite Party)
Office at 88, K. N. C. Road, Nayan Kanan, Kolkata - 700124.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. Firoza Khatoon PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Sailaranjan Das MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Maitreyee Chakraborty MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 15 Apr 2024
Final Order / Judgement

Order no. 2

Ld. Advocate for the opposite party nos.1 and 2/petitioners is present.

Ld. Advocate for the complainant is present and files written objection. Copy served.

The Misc. Application dated 16.02.2024 is taken up for hearing along with its objection.

Perused. Considered. Heard both sides.

Ld. Advocate for the opposite parties/petitioners submits that the complainant has relied upon some photo copies of the document submitted by him in his supplementary affidavit in chief. Prior to filing of questionnaires the opposite party nos.1 and 2 are required to inspect the original of those documents.

Ld. Advocate for the complainant submits that no specification of documents has been mentioned in the Misc. Application as such the same is liable to be rejected.

On perusal of the record we find that the complainant has submitted photo copies of documentary evidence along with supplementary affidavit in chief.

Therefore for proper adjudication of the case, the Misc. Application dated 16.02.2024 filed by the opposite party nos.1 and 2/petitioners is allowed.

The complainant is directed to submit the originals of the documentary evidence submitted in the form of supplementary evidence of affidavit by the complainant in CC/17/2022.

Thus the Misc. Application dated 16.02.2024 is allowed an disposed of on contest.

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Firoza Khatoon]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sailaranjan Das]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Maitreyee Chakraborty]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.