West Bengal

Murshidabad

EA/10/2014

Muktar Sk - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager, Tata AIG Life Insurance Co Ltd. & another - Opp.Party(s)

30 Dec 2016

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum
Berhampore, Murshidabad.
 
Execution Application No. EA/10/2014
In
CC/09/2013
 
1. Muktar Sk
Late Naimuddin Sk, Vill- Khanpur, PO- Chhabghati, PS- Suti,
Murshidabad
West Bengal
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. The Manager, Tata AIG Life Insurance Co Ltd. & another
Delphi B Wing, 2nd floor Orchand Avenue, Hiranandini, Business Park, Powli, Mumbai- 400076
2. Branch Manager, Tata AIG Life Insurance Co Ltd.
1st floor, Angan Building, 1/3, K.K. Banerjee Road, PO & PS- Berhampore, Pin- 742101
Murshidabad
West Bengal
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. ANUPAM BHATTACHARYYA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. PRANATI ALI MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
Dated : 30 Dec 2016
Final Order / Judgement

Smt. Pranati Ali, Presiding Member.

This Execution Application has been arisen out CC/09/2013 which was disposed of on 17.01.2014 being allowed on contest against the Opposite Party with a cost of Rs.2,000/-.  The Opposite Party is directed to pay a sum of Rs.(2,00,000.00–16089.18)= Rs.183,910.82 to the complainant as benefit of the Insurance Policy within 45 days here from. If the Opposite Party fails to comply with the order of the Forum, he is to pay Rs.50/- as fine per day’s delay and the amount to be accumulated shall be deposited in the State Consume Welfare Fund.

The D.hr has filed this Execution Application on 28.03.2014 as the Jdr.-OP did not comply the aforesaid order.

The case has been fixed for awaiting order from the Hon’ble State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, W.B. vide FA No. 380 of 2014 for numerous dates. The D.hr. is found absent since 30.10.2014. The Jdr has been filing only haziras.  

Now the order of the Hon’ble State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, W.B. dated 30.10.2014 has been derived from ‘CONFONET’ in Appeal No. FA No. 380 of 2014.

The Hon’ble State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, W.B. has passed the order in that appeal on 30.10.2014 as under:-

‘That the appeal be and the same is allowed on contest against the Respondent, but without cost.  The impugned order is hereby set aside.  Consequently, the complaint case stands dismissed.’

As per above order of the Hon’ble State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, W.B., the complaint is dismissed and as such the execution case be disposed of accordingly.

Hence,

                                                                               Ordered

that the Execution Application No. 10/2014 be and the same is hereby disposed of as per order dated 30.10.14 of the of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, W.B.

Let a plain copy of this order be made available and be supplied free of cost, to each of the parties on contest in person, Ld. Advocate/Agent on record, by hand under proper acknowledgment / be sent forthwith under ordinary post  to the concerned parties as per rules, for information and necessary action.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. ANUPAM BHATTACHARYYA]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. PRANATI ALI]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.