Orissa

Jagatsinghapur

CC/380/2022

Sri Sarada Prasad Pradhan - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager Sundaram Finance Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Mr.C.Mishra

19 Sep 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION JAGATSINGHPUR
JAGATSINGHPUR
 
Complaint Case No. CC/380/2022
( Date of Filing : 28 Nov 2022 )
 
1. Sri Sarada Prasad Pradhan
S/o. Sri Chandramani Pradhan, At/P.O.- Bagada, P.S.- Kendrapara Sadar, Dist.- Kendrapara
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Manager Sundaram Finance Ltd.
Uday Vihar, Atharabanki, P.O.- PPL Square, Paradeep, Dist.- Jagatsinghpur- 754142
2. The Manager, Sundaram Finance Ltd
At- Plot No.A/167, Metro Polic, 1st Floor, Saheed Nagar, Back side of Sporse Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Dist.- Khurda- 751007
3. The Manager, Sundaram Finance Ltd
Regd. Office- 21, Patullos Road, Chennai- 600002
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. PRAVAT KUMAR PADHI PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. MADHUSMITA SWAIN MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Mr.C.Mishra, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 Mr. S.K. Naik, Advocate, Advocate for the Opp. Party 1
Dated : 19 Sep 2024
Final Order / Judgement

                                                                                           C.C. No.380/2022

 

Sri Barada Prasad Pradhan,

S/o. Sri Chandramani Pradhan,

At/P.O.- Bagada,

P.S.- Kendrapara Sadar,

Dist.- Kendrapara.……… Complainant​

  1. The Manager, Sundaram Finance Ltd.

At- Plot No.1495, 1st Floor,

Uday Vihar, Atharabanki,

P.O.- PPL Square, Paradeep,

Dist.- Jagatsinghpur- 754142.

  1. The Manager, Sundaram Finance Ltd.

At- Plot No.A/167, Metro Polic,

  1.  

Back side of Sporse Hospital,

Bhubaneswar,

Dist.- Khurda- 751007.

  1. The Manager, Sundaram Finance Ltd.

Regd. Office- 21, Patullos Road,

Chennai- 600002.                                             …..… Opposite parties                 

 

For Complainant………..Mr. C. Mishra & Associates

For Opposite Parties……….Mr. S.K. Naik, Advocate

 

Date of Hearing: 29.8.2024                      Date of Judgment: 19.9.2024

ORDER BY HON’BLE PRESIDENT- MR. P.K. PADHI:

                                                                                                  JUDGMENT

            Complainant has filed the consumer complaint U/s.35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 seeking not to repossess his vehicle bearing Regd. No.OD-29-G-6979 and to restructure the loan.

            Complainant took loan of Rs.30,40,000/- on 01.11.2019 to repay in 56 monthly EMI @ Rs.82,680/- commencing from 05.5.2021 to 05.10.2027. Complainant failed to pay and violated the agreement for which on apprehension of repossession complainant has filed the consumer complaint seeking aforesaid relief. Relationship between complainant and opposite parties is that of debtor and Creditor, we find no merit in the consumer complaint and any deficiency on the part of opposite parties. Besides that complainant is a defaulter of loan as per agreement.

            However taking a linnet view we dispose of the consumer complaint directing the opposite parties not to take any coercive action provided the complainant shall pay his regular EMI and in addition to that pay Rs.30,000/- (thirty thousand) in each month towards pending EMI and shall clear the entire loan prior to termination of agreement. With the aforesaid observation and direction the consumer complaint is disposed of. No cost.  

            Pronounced in the open Commission on this 19th Sept.,2024.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. PRAVAT KUMAR PADHI]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. MADHUSMITA SWAIN]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.