Orissa

Rayagada

CC/143/2018

Smt. Namita Pujari - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager, Sriram Transport Finance Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

Self

07 Apr 2021

ORDER

DISTRICT   CONSUMER  DISPUTES REDRESSAL    COMMISSION, RAYAGADA,

STATE:  ODISHA.

C.C. Case  No.  143 / 2018.                                          Date.      7  .     04  . 2021

 

P R E S E N T .

.

Sri  Gadadhara  Sahu,                                           President

Smt. Padmalaya  Mishra,                                     Member.

 

Sri   Namita  Pujari,W/O: Sri  Binod  Kumar Pujari, At/Po:Tikiri, Dist: Rayagada,

Pin No. 765015,  State:Odisha,  Cell No. 94370774452.    … Complainant.

Versus.

1.The Manager, Sriram Transport Finance Company Ltd., 101-105, Ist. Floor,B wing, Shiv Chambers, Sector-11, C.B.D. Belapur, Navi Mumbai- 400 614.

2. The   Branch  Manager, Sriram Transport Finance Company Ltd., Near Swagat  Hotel,  Po/Dist:  Rayagada, State:Odisha                                  …. Opposite parties.

Counsel for the parties:                         

For the complainant: - Self.

For the O.Ps:- Sri K.Ch..G.S.Kumandan, Advocate, Rayagada.

                                                           

JUDGEMENT   

The  crux of the case is that  the above named complainant alleging deficiency in service  against  afore mentioned O.Ps    for  non issue  of  NOC towards  finance  vehicle REgd. No. OD-10-7983   for which  the complainant  sought for redressal of the grievances raised by the complainant.                                                                                                                  

The learned counsel for the  O.P have appeared and filed written version  on behalf of the O.Ps and defend the case.

The  O.Ps have issued NOC in favour of the complainant towards the finance vehicle. The  present dispute between the complainant & O.Ps have settled with full and final  satisfaction  of  the complaint  and provide proper service  and no claim further  against them from the complainant as the dispute solved  among themselves. Hence the complainant  prays the forum to dispose the case accordingly  as settled out of the court.

          Heard from the parties. During the course of hearing the O.Ps have not objected the memo filed by  the complainant.  Perused  the   record  and  memo  filed by the complainant inter alia NDC  issued by the O.Ps.  The memo is allowed.

                Accordingly the present dispute mitigated  and the  case stands disposed  off  but O.Ps wriggled out of  liabilities & the  case closed against  them    as  the  complainant   do not want to  proceed  with  the case further against the O.Ps  after settled the matter amicably out of court.  Parties are left  to bear their own cost.

               

Dictated and corrected by me.       Pronounced on this          7  th    Day of       April, 2021.

               

                                                                                Member.                                              President.