View 3033 Cases Against Maruti
Niharika Routray filed a consumer case on 20 Feb 2015 against The Manager Sky Automobiles(Formerly Maruti Automobiles) in the Jajapur Consumer Court. The case no is CC/28/2014 and the judgment uploaded on 21 Feb 2015.
IN THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, JAJPUR.
Present: 1.Shri Biraja Prasad Kar, President.
2.Sri Pitabas Mohanty, Member,
3.Miss Smita Ray,Lady Member.
Dated the 20th day of February,2015.
C.C.Case No.28 of 2014
Niharika Routray, W/O Ajay kishore Routray
At.Hirapur P.O.Rambag,
P.S/Dist.- Jajpur ……………..Complainant .
(Versus)
1. The Manager,SKY Automobiles (formerly maruti Automobiles)
At/P.O. Bhanpur,N.H.5.Cuttack.
2. The Manager, Authorised Dealer ,Sky Automobiles out let-
Benapur Chhak,Near Janha Hotel Jajpur Road, Dist. Jajpaur.
…………………………Opp.Parties.
For the Complainant: Sri M.S.Mahunta, Sri R.K.Jena, S,Mishra, Advocates.
For the Opp.Parties: Sri B.Ch.Ghaadei, Sri S.K.Sahoo, Advocates.
Date of order : 20.02.2015 .
SHRI PITABAS MOHANTY, MEMBER.
The petitioner has come with this complain petition alleging deficiency in service on the part of the O.Ps.
Brief fact of the case as per complain petition are that the petitioner purchased one Brand New MARUTI ALTO –K10 XXA-AMR 4CD2 on dt.29.11.13 from O.P’s show room Sky Automobiles ,Bhanpur, Cuttack vide model No.K10BN,chasis No.MA3EA-DE1500501678 , Engine No.K10BN4602169 respectively. The petitioner also purchased the above maintained Car under Exchange Scheme of Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. That the cost of the new Car was Rs.3,22,188.00 and after exchange of the old ALTO Car bearing Regd. No.OR-04H-3816 exchange value of Rs.76,757/- the rest amount of Rs. 2,25,431/- was paid by the petitioner vide demand draft bearing No.14049 dt.27.11.13 issued by Urban Co-operative Bank, Jajpur Town Branch. The above amount covers balance cost of the new car, insurance premium and registration charges . Accordingly the O.Ps. issued retail invoice / money receipt in favour of the petitioner mentioning the full and final amount as cost of the above vehicle and clearly it was mentioned that no finance /hypothecation on the above vehicle.
That as per general terms and condition after delivery of vehicle the O.Ps. shall hand over the original registration certificate and others relevant documents relating to the newly purchased vehicle but the O.Ps. handed over the photo copy of the registration certificate to the petitioner. In that registration certificate it has been mentioned that the above purchased new vehicle is hypothecated to U.CO. Bank,Kuanpal Branch, Cuttack where as the petitioner has purchased the vehicle by cash. That on the very day the petitioner intimated the office of the O.Ps. about the mistake and demanded the mistake free original R.C Book. Thereafter the petitioner contacted over phone and personally visited the office of the O.Ps. at Jajpur Road and Cuttack in order to rectify the mistake committed by the O.Ps. That on 03.03.2013 O.Ps. flatly refused to rectify the mistake of the documents and handed over the original R.C Book stating the petitioner not to disturb them. So without relevant documents the petitioner could not play the vehicle due to deficiency of service on the part of the O.Ps. for not providing the original correct registration certificate. Therefore, finding no ulternative way ,the petitioner knock the door at the Fora with the prayer to direct the O.Ps. to hand over the correct original Registration Certificate and claiming Rs.50,000/- compensation towards mental agony.
In the present case there are two O.Ps..After noticed they appeared through their advocate and filed a petition along with original R.C Book. In that petition the O.Ps. stated that :
That in the above mentioned facts and circumstances the C.C.Case No.28/14 may be dropped.
Thereafter the advocate for the petitioner received the original R.C Book and filed objection to the above petition filed by the O.Ps.
In view of the above contradicting views of both the parties and after perusal of the record along with documents filed from both the sides we are inclined to decide the present dispute as stated below:-
Admittedly it is cleared that the petitioner purchased a new MARUTI ALTO K10 from the O.Ps. on dt.29.11.13 by exchanged her old ALTO Car. After exchange of the old car the balance amount of the new Car Rs.2,25,431/- has been paid by the petitioner vide Demand Draft bearing No.14079 dt.27.11.13 issued by the Urban Co-operative Bank ,Jajpur Town branch. The above amount includes the registration charges and Insurance premium of the vehicle. The O.Ps also issued money receipt / retail invoice to the petitioner that the amount relates to full and final payment and no finance over the above vehicle. After verification the documents filed by both the parties it is unknown under what circumstances the O.Ps. handed over the photo copy of the R.C Book dt. 15.01.2014 of the above new purchased vehicle wherein it is reflected that the above vehicle hypothecated by U.Co. Bank Kuanpal Branch ,Cuttack . Besides this the Car purchased on dt.29.11.13 by Cash and the registration has been done on dt.15.01.14 after lapse of 47 days and thereafter the O.Ps. handed over the photo copy of the defective R.C Book. It is also found that the O.Ps. are unable to establish that what step they have taken to rectify the error of the R.C Book . Besides the O.Ps. deposited the original rectified R.C Book before the Forum after filing of the C.C.Case and during pendency of the present dispute and expiry of 7 (seven) months, where as without original R.C Book the vehicle could not play over on the road. This is nothing but clearly deficiency in service on the part of the O.Ps. . Accordingly the dispute is allowed against the O.Ps. as per the order stated below:-.
O R D E R
In the net result the dispute is allowed against the O.Ps. . The O.Ps. are directed to pay Rs.5,000/-( five thousand) as compensation for mental agony to the petitioner within one month after receipt of this order, failing which the petitioner is at liberty to take proper step as per law. The above amount of compensation has been allowed as per observation of national Commission reported in 2005(III) CPJ-30-N.C,since the O.Ps. have filed the correct R.C Book after filing of the present dispute.
This order is pronounced in the open Forum on this the 20th day of February ,2015. under my hand and seal of the Forum.
(Shri Pitabas Mohanty)
Member.
(Shri Biraja Prasad Kar) Typed to my dictation & corrected by me
President
(Shri Pitabas Mohanty)
(Miss Smita Ray) Member.
Lady Member.
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.