Tamil Nadu

North Chennai

CC/106/2015

R.Saranya - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager, Shriram Chits Tamil Nadu Pvt Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

B.Manoharan, R.Jayanthi

03 Mar 2017

ORDER

                                                                           Complaint presented on:  25.06.2015

                                                                               Order pronounced on:  03.03.2017

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (NORTH)

    2^nd Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C.Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3

 

PRESENT: THIRU.K.JAYABALAN, B.Sc., B.L.,        PRESIDENT

                    TMT.T.KALAIYARASI, B.A.B.L.:           MEMBER II

 

FRIDAY THE 03^rd DAY OF MARCH 2017

 

                                          C.C.NO.106/2015

 

 

R.Saranya,

D/o.M.S.Ravikumar Raja,

No.20/116, Manickavasagar Street,

Jagathambigai  Nagar,

Padi, Chennai – 600 050.s

                                                                                    ..... Complainant

 

                                     ..Vs..

 

1.The Manager,

Shri Ram Chits Tamil Nadu Private Limited,

Villivakkam Branch,

No.100/41, East Mada Street,

First Floor, Villivakkam,

Chennai – 600 049.

 

2.The Manager,

Shri Ram City Union Finance Limited,

Main Branch,

No.145, Ground Floor,

Santhome High Road,

Mylapore, Chennai – 600 004.

 

                            

                                                                                      …..Opposite parties

 

 

         

Date of complaint                                      : 08.07.2015

Counsel for complainant                 :M/s.B.Manoharan,R.Jayanthi

Counsel for 1,2 Opposite Parties    :K.V.Ananthakrushnan,

                                                           V.Chandrasekar, K.P.Muralidharan.

 

O R D E R

 

BY PRESIDENT THIRU. K.JAYABALAN B.Sc., B.L.,

This complaint is filed by the complainant u/s 12 of the Consumer Protection Act.1986.

No representation for Complainant till 3.20 p.m inspite of posted today as last chance to file his proof affidavit.  Complainant also called absent till then. In spite of 15 hearing time given to file proof affidavit of Complainant and to also posted to file the proof affidavit as last chance, the failed to file the same establishes  as that the Complaint is not interested in prosecuting the Complaint. Hence the Complaint is dismissed for default for non filing of proof affidavit and non prosecution. No costs.

                 Pronounced by us on this 03^rd  day of March 2017.

 

      -sd-                                                                                 -sd-     

MEMBER – II                                                              PRESIDENT