Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/195/2018

Mrs. S. Shanthi, W/o S. Amuthaventhan, - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager, Reliance Mobile, Mumbai-400 770 and another - Opp.Party(s)

M.Hariharan-applt

28 Nov 2022

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                        PRESIDENT

                      Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                           MEMBER

 

F.A. No.195/2018

 

(Against the Order dt.31.10.2017 made in C.C. No.113/2015 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Chennai (North))

DATED THE 28^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022

 

Mrs. S. Shanthi,

W/o. Mr. S. Amuthaventhan,

No.1274, Golden Colony,

Anna Nagar West Extension,

Chennai – 600 050.                                                            .. Appellant / Complainant

-Versus-

 

1. The Manager,

Reliance Mobile,

H-Block, 1^st Floor,

Dhirubhai Ambani Knowledge City,

Navi Mumbai – 400 710.

 

2. The Manager,

Reliance Mobile,

No.415/2, Panneer Nagar,

Thiruvallurvar Salai,

Mogappair East,

Chennai – 600 037.                                                   .. Respondents / Opposite parties.

.

 

Counsel for Appellant / Complainant                   : M/s. M. Hariharan

Counsel for 1^st Respondent / 1^st Opposite party : M/s. Shivakumar & Suresh

2^nd Respondent / 2^nd Opposite party                   : Served called absent

 

          This appeal coming up before us on 28.11.2022 for appearance of the appellant and for taking steps to implead the Resolution Professional (finally) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:                                                                                                

 

Docket Order

 

No representation for the appellant.  1^st Respondent present. The matter is pending for a long time for taking steps to implead the Resolution Profession by the appellant.

This appeal is posted today for appearance of the appellant, for taking steps to implead the Resolution Professional or for dismissal. 

When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M., the appellant was not present.   Hence, passed over and called again at 01.00 P.M. still, there is no representation for the appellant.  Hence, we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default.    No order as to costs.

 

               

               Sd/-                                                                                                           Sd/-                                                                        

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                         R.SUBBIAH                        

             MEMBER                                                                                           PRESIDENT