View 16844 Cases Against Reliance
View 32452 Cases Against Life Insurance
View 32452 Cases Against Life Insurance
Smt.Rajeswari Kumabhar, filed a consumer case on 03 Mar 2016 against The Manager, Reliance Life Insurance Co. Ltd, in the Rayagada Consumer Court. The case no is CC/240/2015 and the judgment uploaded on 03 Dec 2016.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, RAYAGADA
C.C. Case No.240/ 2015.
P R E S E N T .
Sri Pradeep Kumar Dash, LL.B President.
AND
Smt. Ch. Nirmala Kumari Raju, LLB Member
Smt.Rajeswari Kumbhar, aged about 23 yars, Daughter of Gopal Kumbhar, W/o Raghunath @ Rabi Kumbhara, Resident of village: Bhaleri, P.O.Chalakambh, P.S. Gunupur, Dist. Rayagada, Odisha. …..Complainant
Vrs.
Reliance Life Insurance Company Limited,(Regd.No.121) ,H.Block,1st floor, Dhirubai Ambani Knowledge City, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra being represented by its Branch Manager, Rayagada Branch Office, Kapilas Road, Rayagada, Po/Ps/Dist. Rayagada …..Opp.Party
For the Complainant: In person
For the O.P: Sri Ram Prasad Patra & Associate Advocates, Rayagada.
JUDGMENT
The facts of the case in brief is that the complainant is the policy holder of Reliance Life Insurance Company Limited and he has deposited Rs.30,000/- on 10.2.2010 at Rayagada branch office under the plan Reliance Super Market Return Term 10 Plan(Single) through the agent of the company and the company has issued a policy bearing Client ID No.73774845 to the petitioner. The complainant approached the Opp.Party for surrender of the policy on 21.1.2015 at Branch Office ,Rayagada but the Opp.Party told that the amount in the above policy has been paid to the policy holder but the petitioner has not received the said amount till today and due to such negligence of the company the petitioner has sustained heavy loss and mental agony and hence prayed to direct the O.p to pay the matured amount of the above policy and to pay RS.20,000/- as compensation to the petitioner . On being noticed, the O.Ps appeared through their Counsel before this forum and filed their written version/objection inter alia denying the petition allegations on all its material particulars. It is submitted by the O.P that the policy was surrendered on 23.05.2014 and the amount was transferred to her account No.33823714722 of SBI and an amount of Rs.40,549.98 was transferred online vide HDFC NEFT Ref No.140529997325 dt.29.05.2014 and now after receipt of the surrender amount the complainant with manipulative gluttony has again come up with this frivolous litigation and hence this complaint is liable to be dismissed . The complainant has wilfully voluntarily surrender the policy and accepted the surrender amount without any protest. The complainant has failed to make out a prima facie case against the Opp.Party and hence the relief sought for buy the complainant are denied as false, unsustainable and without any merits and hence, the complaint petition be dismissed with cost. FINDING
It is the case of the complainant that he has deposited Rs.30,000/- with the Opp.Party as a single premium and when he wanted to surrendered the Opp.Party replied that the complainant has already surrendered the policy and has taken the amount with interest to which the complainant strongly opposed. In reply the Opp.Party has submitted that the complainant has surrendered the policy on 23.05.2014 and the amount was transferred to her account No.33823714722 of SBI and an amount of Rs.40,549.98 was transferred online vide HDFC NEFT Ref No.140529997325 dt.29.05.2014. If it is so, to substantiate their claim the Opp.Party has not filed a single piece of papers regarding the payment of surrender amount to the complainant and simply they have submitted that the complainant has already surrendered the policy and the policy amount was paid to the complainant to which we do not believe. If it is so, the Opp.Party would have filed the documentary evidence to substantiate their case. But in the instant case the Opp.Party has not
not filed any document in support of their case. Hence, we do not believe the mere submission of the Opp.Party in absence of any documentary evidence. In the above facts and circumstances, the submission of Opp.Party is quite unbelievable and the action of the O.P is doubtful which amounts to unfair trade practice for which they are liable to pay the deposited amount along with compensation and cost to the complainant towards his harassment and mental agony. Hence, we pass the following orders.
ORDER
The Opp.Party is liable to pay the deposited amount of Rs.30,000/- with applicable benefit as per the term and conditions of the policy bond from the date of deposit till its realization to the complainant along with compensation of Rs.5,000/- for harassment and mental agony caused to the complainant. Further the O.Ps are liable to pay Rs.1500/- towards cost of litigation to the complainant within one month from the date of receipt of this order , failing which the O.Ps are liable to pay penal interest @. 12 % on the entire awarded amount till its realization.
Pronounced in open forum today on this 18th day of February,2016 under the seal and signature of this forum.
Send the copy of order to the parities free of cost.
Member President
Documents relied upon:
By the complainant:
By the O.Ps: Nil
President
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.