Haryana

Karnal

CC/14/2021

Gurvinder Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager, Reliance Health Insurance - Opp.Party(s)

Sohan Sharma

05 Feb 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                          Complaint.No.14 of 2021

                                                          Date of instt.11.01.2021

                                                          Date of Decision:05.02.2024

 

1. Gurvinder Singh son of Sh. Sheesha Singh.
2. Amarjeet Kaur wife of Sh. Gurvinder Singh, both R/o VPO Darar District Karnal.

 

          ...…Complainants

                                        Versus

1. The Manager Reliance Health Insurance City Centre, 1^st floor I.B. College, Near Karur Vyasa Bank, GT road, Panipat.
2. The Manager Reliance Health Insurance,R Care Health, 1-89/3/B/40 to 42/KS/301, 3^rd floor Krishe block, Krishe Sapphire, Madhapur, Hyderabad, Telangana-500081.

 

                        ....Opposite parties.

                                             

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before    Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member.

                Dr. Suman Singh………….Member.

               

Present:  None for the complainant.

                OP-2 exparte vide order dated 19.07.2023.

                         

                Today the case is fixed for notice to the OP-1. Notice issued to OP-1 received back with the report of incorrect address. No one has put into appearance on behalf of the complainant. The present complaint pertains to years 2021 and same is still at the stage of preliminary hearing, i.e. notice to the OP-1. Complainant has failed to file the correct address since filing the complaint. Repeatedly the case has been adjourned on the request of learned counsel for the complainant. Case called several times since morning but none has put into appearance on behalf of the complainant. It is already 03:30 PM. No wait is justified. It appears that complainant is no more interested to pursue his case. There is no justification to adjourn the case further for the same purpose.

                Hence, in view the above facts, the present complaint is hereby dismissed. However, complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action in the court of competent jurisdiction, if so desired. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Dated:05.02.2024             

                     President,

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

(Vineet Kaushik)   (Dr. Suman Singh) 

  Member                    Member