District Consumer Commission, Bokaro.
CC No. 26/2018
Date of Filing 26-02-2018
Date of final hearing-16-09-2022
Date of Order- 16-09-2022
Vijay Kumar S/o Suraj Manjhi
R/o Bansimli, P.O.-Radha Nagar, P.S.-Balidih, Bokaro.
Vs.
The Manager, Ranju Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. Authorised dealer of Bajaj Auto Limited, Western Avenue, Naya More, P.O. & P.S.- B.S.City, Distt.- Bokaro.
Shri Jai Prakash Narayan Pandey, President
Shri Bhawani Prasad Lal Das, Member
Smt. Baby Kumari, Member
-: Order-:
- Complainant has filed this case with prayer for direction to O.P. to correct the papers and to repair the disturb part of the vehicle and to pay Rs. 10,000/- as compensation and Rs. 5000/- as litigation cost.
- Complainant’s case in brief is that he purchased Bajaj Pulsar 150 Motorcycle on 10.10.2016 for which he paid Rs. 82,455/- including the cost of registration, insurance etc. Further case is that in the invoice Chassis number was mentioned MD2A11C29GRG30698 but in the registration card and insurance papers it has been mentioned MD2A11C29GRD30698 instead of MD2A11C29GRG30698 which is wrong though it has been rightly mentioned in the invoice issued by the O.P. Further case is that due to such wrong entry petitioner is unable to get the insurance policy renewed. Further case is that there was defect in vehicle which was not treated properly by the O.P. causing pain to the complainant. Hence this case has been filed.
- As per W.S. all the defects pointed out in the paper were typing mistakes which have already been corrected accordingly registration paper has also been prepared. It is wrong to say that one mistake may cause problem in renewal of the insurance policy. All the defects of the vehicle concerned have been removed on 09.10.2017 and 02.06.2017.
- Point for determination is whether complainant is able to prove his case for grant of relief as prayed or not?
- Complainant has produced certificate of registration card. On perusal of said registration card it shows that chassis number of the vehicle has been mentioned as MD2A11C29GRG30698 in it which is correct and in accordance with invoice dt. 10.10.2016 and photo copy of said invoice is Annexure-5 of the complaint petition. As per para 4 of the complaint petition the chassis No. Mentioned in the invoice is correct. It is apparent from the registration certificate produced by the complainant that the chassis number mentioned in the registration certificate is in accordance with the invoice issued by O.P. Therefore, the contention of the complaint petition that R.C. paper has been issued with wrong chassis number has not been proved by the complainant.
- As per O.P. repair work has already been done by the O.P. to the satisfaction of the complainant. Contrary to it there is no evidence by the complainant to show that there is any defect in service of the vehicle concerned. The papers filed by the O.P. are showing that in the sale certificate (Form 21) correct chassis number has been mentioned. Photo copy of job cards dt. 09.10.2017, 02.04.2017 and 02.06.2017 are showing that vehicle concerned has been repaired/serviced to the satisfaction of the complainant and contrary to it complainant has not adduced/filed any evidence in this case in support of the contentions related to none removal of the defects in the vehicle concerned.
- So far, renewal of insurance policy is concerned, on this aspect also there is no evidence by the complainant to show that he had attempted for renewal of the policy on the basis of corrected registration certificate but could not succeed to get the insurance policy of the vehicle be renewed.
- Therefore, in light of above discussion we are of the view that complainant has not proved its case for grant of any relief. Accordingly this case is being dismissed with cost.
