Haryana

Karnal

CC/785/2019

Sushil Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager, Punjab National Bank - Opp.Party(s)

17 Nov 2020

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                                     Complaint No.785 of 2020

                                                                     Date of instt. 26.11.2019

                                                                     Date of Decision 17.11.2020

1.       Sushil Kumar son of Mangat Ram;

2.       Manohar Lal son of Shri Mangat Ram;

3.       Sandeep Kumar son of Mangat Ram, residents of Village Modipur, Tehsil and District Karnal.

                                                                             …….Complainant

                                      Versus

1.       Manager, Punjab National Bank, Gheer, District Karnal.

2.       Manager, SBI General Insurance Company, SCO No.388-389, Ist Floor, B.D.International, Karan Commercial Complex, Old Mugal Canal, Karnal.

3.       Deputy Director, Agriculture, Karnal.

                                                                             …..Opposite parties

 

Complaint under Section 12 of Consumer Protection Act.

 

Before    Sh. Jaswant Singh………President.   

      Sh.Vineet Kaushik ………..Member

                Dr. Rekha Chaudhary…….Member

 

 Present:   Shri Hardyal Singh, counsel for complainant.

                   None for OPs No.1 & 3.  

                   Shri Naveen Khetarpal, counsel for OP No.2

         

          Today the case was fixed for filing written version on behalf of OPs No.1 & 3. Learned counsel for complainant moved an application for permission to withdraw the present complaint. Learned counsel for complainant also suffered a separate statement to the effect that he does not want to pursue with the present complaint and withdraws the same on account of technical defect and sought permission to file afresh before the competent Court.

                In view of statement of learned counsel for complainant, the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant would be at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action in the court of competent jurisdiction. File be consigned to the record room after due compliance.

Announced
Dated:17.11.2020

 

 

(Vineet Kaushik)           (Dr. Rekha Chaudhary)                President,                 Member                           Member                     District Consumer Disputes                                                                        Redressal Commission, Karnal.