Chandigarh

DF-I

CC/84/2020

Dr. Prabir Das - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager, Omaxe Chandigarh Extn. Dev. P. Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

In Person

12 Dec 2020

ORDER

BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT HELD IN

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-I

U.T. CHANDIGARH

 

CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO.84 OF  2020

 

DR.PRABIR DAS & ANR.

VS.

THE MANAGER, OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTN. DEV. P. LTD. & OTHERS

 

PRESENT:

 

            RATTAN SINGH THAKUR, PRESIDENT (JUDGE OF THE LOK ADALAT)

            SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER – LOK ADALAT      

 

PRESENT:

None for Complainants.

Sh.Arjun Sharma, Counsel for OPs.

 

Dated the 12th day of December, 2020

ORDER

            In compliance with the notice/order dated 15.05.2020 & 29.05.2020 of the Hon’ble State Commission, U.T. Chandigarh, case taken up through video conferencing due to outbreak of COVID-19 & measures to control it, as per Standard Operating Procedure framed by the Hon’ble State Commission, U.T. Chandigarh.

 

            Per office report, the Complainant was informed telephonically. However, the Complainant has not put in appearance, despite knowledge, through virtual hearing.

 

            Perusal of the record shows that this case was fixed on 09.12.2020. Even on the said date, none had put in appearance for the Complainant. However, an application was received from the Complainant through e-mail, wherein permission was sought to withdraw the Consumer Complaint, as the matter stood compromised. Along with the said application, a Settlement Deed dated 01.10.2020 has also been annexed. The said e-mail was received from the e-mail account of the Complainant i.e. prabirdaspgi@gmail.com.

 

            In view of receipt of the aforesaid application, through e-mail, for withdrawal of the Complaint, accompanied with copy of Settlement Deed and non-appearance of the Complainant, despite knowledge, even on the previous date i.e. 09.12.2020 and even today the Complainant has not put in appearance despite having been informed telephonically, it goes to suggest that the Complainant is not interested in the further prosecution of the Consumer Complaint. Hence, this Consumer Complaint is dismissed for want of prosecution and per the observations made hereinbefore, the Award is accordingly passed.

            Certified copy of this order be communicated to the parties free of charge.  After compliance file be consigned.      

 

Sd/-

[RATTAN SINGH THAKUR]

JUDGE OF THE LOK ADALAT

 

Sd/-

[SURJEET KAUR]

MEMBER-LOK ADALAT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.