Haryana

Karnal

CC/537/2024

Sarita - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager, New India Assurance Company Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Shubham

26 Nov 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                          Complaint No.537 of 2024

                                                          Date of instt. 06.11.2024

                                                          Date of Decision 26.11.2024

 

1.     Sarita wife of late shri Sukhdev aged 35 years

2.     Kritika aged 14 years minor daughter late Shri Sukhdev, through her mother Smt.Sarita.

3.     Sanvi Sharma aged 12 years, minor daughter of late Shri Sukhdev, through her mother Smt.Sarita.

4.     Navya Sharma aged 5 years, minor daughter of late Shri Sukhdev, through her mother Smt.Sarita.

5.     Sara aged 3 years, minor daughter of late Shri Sukhdev, through her mother Smt.Sarita,all residents of village Sirsal, District Kaithal.  

                                                                                ……Complainants

                                                        Versus

1.     The Manager, New India Assurance Company Limited, Gagan Building, above Union Bank of India, Opposite Old Bus Stand, Karnal.

2.     The Manager, New India Assurance Company Limited, 87, M.G. Road, Fort, Mumbai 400001.

……Opposite parties.

 

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before    Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

Mrs.Neeru Agarwal………...Member

                Mrs. Sarvjeet Kaur…………Member.

                               

Present:   Shri Vikram Singh, counsel for the complainant.

                           

       Today the case is fixed for consideration on the point of admissibility of complaint.

        Learned counsel for the complainant has suffered his separate statement to effect that due to technical reason, he does not want to pursue with the present complaint and withdraws the same with permission to file the fresh complaint on the same cause of action before the competent Court of law.

      In view of the above statement, the present complaint is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action before the competent Court of law, if so desired. The original documents annexed with the complaint, if any, be returned to the complainant by placing on record photocopies of the same. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

 

Dated: 26.11.2024.          

                  President,     

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

 

  (Neeru Agarwal)              (Sarvjeet Kaur)

      Member                           Member