West Bengal

Nadia

CC/113/2022

KOUSIK DAS - Complainant(s)

Versus

THE MANAGER MUTHOOT FIN CORP GOLD LOAN - Opp.Party(s)

ARINDAM SAHA

17 Jan 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NADIA
170,DON BOSCO ROAD, AUSTIN MEMORIAL BUILDING.
NADIA, KRISHNAGAR
 
Complaint Case No. CC/113/2022
( Date of Filing : 30 Nov 2022 )
 
1. KOUSIK DAS
S/O- JAYANTA DAS OF SADHANPARA, P.O.- BAHIRGACHHI P.S.- DHUBULIA, DIST. NADIA, PIN- 741154
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. THE MANAGER MUTHOOT FIN CORP GOLD LOAN
(MUTHOOT CAPITAL) 13, 1ST FLOOR MANMOHAN GHOSH STREET NEAR PATRA BAZAR P.O.- KRISHNAGAR, P.S.- KOTWALI, DIST- NADIA, WEST BENGAL, PIN- 741101
2. THE MANAGER, MUTHOOT FIN CORP GOLD LOAN
206, A.P.C. ROAD, 1ST FLOOR, P.S.- SHYAMPUKUR, KOLKATA- 700004
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. HARADHAN MUKHOPADHYAY PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. NIROD BARAN ROY CHOWDHURY MEMBER
 
PRESENT:ARINDAM SAHA, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 
Dated : 17 Jan 2024
Final Order / Judgement

PRESENT       :  Shri   HARADHAN MUKHOPADHYAY                       PRESIDENT           

                         : SHRI NIROD BARAN ROY CHOWDHURY                  MEMBER  

 

                                               Case No.  CC/113/2022

COMPLAINANT    :1.        Kousik Das, S/o Jayanta Das,

 Of Sadhanpara, P.O. Bahirgachhi,

 P.S. Dhubulia,Dist. Nadia, 741154.

 

 

V-E-R-S-U-S

 

 

            OPPOSITE PARTIES /   1.     The Manager,

  MUTHOOT FIN CROP GOLD LOAN, 

  (MUTHOOT CAPITAL)

  13, 1st  Floor Manmohan Ghosh Street

  Near Patra Bazar P.O. Krishnagar, P.S. Kotwali,

  Dist.Nadia,W.B., Pin-741101.

 

                                                     2.      The Manager,

  Muthoot Fin Corp Gold Loan,

                                                              206, A.P.C. Road, 1st Floor, Kolkata – 700004.

                                                               P.S. Shyampukur.

 

                    Ld. Advocate(s)

                                                For Complainant: Mahuya Das Chakraborty

                                                For OP/OPs : None

 

 

                        Date of filing of the case                 :30.11.2022

                        Date of Disposal  of the case                      :17.01.2024

 

 

Final Order / Judgment dtd.17.01.2024

The  concise fact of the case of the complainant is that the complainant Kousik Das purchased a Scooty Activa 125 on 10.08.2019 from Ishan Honda by taking loan  in 36 instalments @ 250 per instalment for the said loan. The complainant  has been regularly  paying the instalment  but during Covid period  the complainant availed  moratorium  and did not pay any amount  during April, 2020 to August, 2020. On 08.10.2022 the complainant  paid Rs.2,502/- as

 

 

(2)

CC/113/2022

31 instalments and the next instalment  was due on 05.11.2022 but on 31.10.2022 the OPs office informed that next instalment amount  is Rs.4,428/-. The excess money was charged  for compound interest during pandemic situation. The complainant sent legal notice to the OPs Manager, MUTHOOT FIN CROP GOLD LOAN on 31.10.2022 which they received  on 31.10.2022. OPs company  is bound  to rectify the same and provide actual  loan statement  to the complainant.  The complainant  is ready to pay actual instalment  money . Due to failure  in rendering  proper service  by the Ops  the complainant sustained monetary loss  harassment, mental pain and agony. So, the present case  is filed. The cause of action arose  on 31.10.2022 and subsequent  date till the filing  of this case. The complainant  obtained  receipts  from the system  of the Ops  company computer  and deducted that the complainant  paid excess amount  against the principal amount . The OPs  company  assured  that they would refund  the excess amount and issued  NOC to the complainant but they did not refund  the money. The complainant further  prayed for an award  directing  the Ops to provide  actual calculation  statement  of his loan and instalment  amount and to allow  moratorium  as per government rules and regulations , Rs.50,000/- towards  unfair trade practice , harassment  and mental pain and agony and litigation cost.

The Ops appear to have not contested. As per order no.12 dated 28.06.2023 case was  heard ex-parte  against OP no.1&2.

The complainant  in order to substantiate the case  adduced  oral evidence  in the form of affidavit in chief  and documentary evidence.

The complainant  categorically  stated that he has  repaid  the loan money. The statement  of account reveals  that the complainant  has paid different instalments time to time for Rs.2,502/- in favour of the Ops  through Axis bank and paytm and also through HDFC bank. The Ops did not deny  about the said repayment  of loan through instalments.

The complainant further  proved  one legal notice given by  Ld. Advocate Mahuya Das Chakraborty on 31.10.2022 to the OPs Muthoot Fin Corp Gold Loan , Krishnagar, Nadia. The said notice was served to the OPs  but they did not  give any reply.  In the said notice  it is specifically  claimed  that excess amount was  calculated  at compound  interest  for the Pandemic situation  despite moratorium announced by the RBI for the period  April, 2020 to August, 2020.  The OPs could not deny the said allegation  in as much as  the OPs  preferred  not to contest the case and failed  to make out  any defence  case.

 

 

(3)

CC/113/2022

The complainant  also proved  the Tax receipt of Motor Vehicle Department  and Registration charge  as well as the insurance policy  certificate  in the name of  the complainant  under Chola M/S General Insurance. The OPs could not discard  any of the documentary evidence  since they did not cross examine the complainant  due to the case being heard ex-parte.

Thus, after perusing the entire pleadings of the complainant  and the specific  oral evidence  in the form of affidavit in chief and documentary evidences. The Commission  comes to the finding that the case against  the OPs  stand proved  ex-parte  upto the hilt . It is well established  that the OPs company charged  excess amount and they are bound to refund the excess money  paid by the complainant  after proper calculation.

The aforesaid activities of the OPs tantamount to deficiency in service  and unfair trade practice

In the result the complaint case succeeds ex-parte against both the OP No.1 & 2. 

Hence,

                              It is

Ordered

that the complaint case no.CC/113/2022 be and the same is allowed ex-parte against  the OP NO.1 , Manager, MUTHOOT FIN CROP GOLD LOAN, Krishnagar & OP No.2 Manager, Muthoot Fin Corp Gold Loan, Kolkata with cost of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand). The complainant Kousik Das do get an award with a direction upon  both the OP No.1 and OP No.2 to provide proper  calculation  of the loan of the  complainant  and the rate of instalment  and to follow the direction  of moratorium  issued by the  government.The complainant further gets an award  for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand) for unfair trade practice harassment , mental pain and agony to the complainant. The OPs  are directed to pay Rs.60,000/- (Rupees sixty thousand) to the complainant  within 30 days  from the date of passing the final order  failing which  the entire award money shall carry an interest @ 10% p.a from the date of passing  the final order till the date of its realisation.

 

 

(4)

CC/113/2022

 

All Interim Applications  (I.A) stand disposed of  accordingly.

D.A to note in the trial register.

The case is accordingly disposed of.

Let a copy of this final order be supplied to both the parties at free of costs.  

              

Dictated & corrected by me

 

 ............................................

                PRESIDENT

(Shri   HARADHAN MUKHOPADHYAY,)                                     ................ ..........................................

                                                                                                                          PRESIDENT

                                                                                             (Shri   HARADHAN MUKHOPADHYAY,)

I  concur,

  ........................................                                                 

          MEMBER                                                                

(NIROD  BARAN   ROY  CHOWDHURY)           

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. HARADHAN MUKHOPADHYAY]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. NIROD BARAN ROY CHOWDHURY]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.