Orissa

Baleshwar

CC/108/2010

Sri Abhimanyu Das, aged 26 years - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager, Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd., Worli - Opp.Party(s)

Sj. N Parida & Others

19 Mar 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BALASORE
AT- KATCHERY HATA, NEAR COLLECTORATE, P.O, DIST- BALASORE-756001
 
Complaint Case No. CC/108/2010
( Date of Filing : 13 Dec 2010 )
 
1. Sri Abhimanyu Das, aged 26 years
S/o. Sri Bhagirath Das, At- Chakrada, P.O- Darada, P.S- Basta, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Manager, Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd., Worli
Marketing Department, Automotive Sector, Road No. 13, Worli, Mumbai- 400018.
Maharashtra
2. Manager, Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd., Mumbai
Gate way Building, Appolo Bunder, Mumbai- 400039.
Maharashtra
3. The Manager, Utkal Automobile Ltd., Bhubaneswar
S/3- 61, Mancheswar Industrial Estate, Bhubaneswar- 751010.
Khurda
Odisha
4. M/s. Basanti Auto Agency, Ganeswarpur, Balasore
Authorised Dealer of Mahindra & Mahindra, N.H-5, Januganj Golei, Ganeswarpur, Balasore.
Odisha
5. Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Amarda Road Branch
At- Amarda Road, Balasore.
Odisha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 19 Mar 2024
Final Order / Judgement

                                         The case is posted today for further hearing. Advocate for the complainant is absent, no steps filed. Advocates for O.Ps are also absent, no steps filed. On repeated calls, none respond on behalf of the complainant. Hence, hearing of the case could not be taken up. Perused the case record.

                                         In the present case, the O.Ps No.1 to 3 & 5 were appeared & filed their separate w/vs. As it appears from the case record that the complainant remained absent since 04.11.19 to till today, for which hearing of the case impaired and the valuable time of this Commission is being wasted. Considering the nature & conduct of the complainant, this Commission is of the view that the complaint of the complainant should be dismissed.   

                                         Accordingly, the complaint of the complainant is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case. The interim order, if any, passed against the O.Ps is treated to be infructuous.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.