Suman Sharma filed a consumer case on 06 Apr 2018 against The Manager LIC in the Ambala Consumer Court. The case no is CC/250/2017 and the judgment uploaded on 10 Apr 2018.
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM AMBALA
Complaint case no. : 250 of 2017
Date of Institution : 21.07.2017
Date of decision : 06.04.2018
Suman Sharma d/o Sh. Krishan Lal Sharma, r/o House No.3, Kamal Vihar, Ambala City.
……. Complainant.
The Manager, LIC Jeevan Sewa Building, Municipal Shopping Complex, Ambala City.
….…. Opposite Party.
Before: Sh. D.N.Arora, President.
Sh. Pushpender Kumar, Member.
Ms. Anamika Gutpa, Member.
Present: Sh. P.S.Sandhu, counsel for complainant.
Sh. R.K.Jindal, counsel for OP.
ORDER:
In nutshell, brief facts of the present complaint is that complainant is the holder of LIC Policy bearing no.177559783 dated 27.07.2011 for sum assured of RS. 1,00,000/- and the complainant has paid the installment of Rs. 3464/- dated 27.07.2011, Rs.3464/- dated 31.10.2011, Rs. 3436/- dated 28.07.2012, Rs. 3464/- dated 31.01.2012, Rs. 3464/- dated 31.1.2012, Rs. 3464 dated 02.05.2012, Rs. 3464/- dated 17.11.2012, Rs. 3464/- dated 07.2.2013 and then lump sum Rs. 14, 578/- on dated 28.03.2014. Now, the complainant does not want to pursue with her above said policy further and wants to take/withdraw her above said all the amount alongwith interest. She several times visited the office of the OP and requested to make the payment alongwith which the complainant has deposited with the OP in her above aid LIC Policy but he OP is putting of the matter on one pretext or the other. The complainant finding no other option also served the OP with a registered/AD legal notice dated 02.11.2016 requiring the OP to make the payment of the above said policy but OP has failed to comply with the said legal notice. The complainant further stated that the OP has failed to provide proper service to her due to unfair trade and practice of the OP and due to this the complainant has faced so many difficulties, harassment, pain and agony. Hence, the present complaint.
2. Upon notice, OP has appeared and filed written statement and learned counsel for the OP stated that the policy no.177559783 was taken under plan & term 14-55-10 with dated of commencement of 27.7.2011 with Qly. Mode of premium of Rs. 3464/- in which premium was to be paid for 10 years. But the complainant had paid premium for 2 years 9 months only. The last premium under this policy was paid for 01/2014, after that the complainant has failed to pay the premium as the premium due for 04/2014 was not paid to keep the policy inforce. So as per the terms and condition of the policy in question nothing is payable to the complainant under the policy. He further stated that the policy in question is lying lapse condition as the premium due in 04/2014 was not paid and the duration of policy is only 2 years 9 months from the date of commencement, so nothing is payable to the complainant as per terms and conditions of policy. As per said Para no.7 of policy bond “The policy can be surrendered for case after the premiums have been paid for at least three years. So in question of requesting by the complainant to the OP for making the payment under the policy in question does not arise at all and the complainant was intimated in this regard. So, there is no deficiency in service on the part of OP and prayed for dismissal of the present complaint.
3 To prove his version complainant tendered his affidavit as Annexure C/X along with documents as annexure C-1 and C-11 and close her evidence. On the other hand, Counsel for the OPs tendered affidavit as Annexure R/A alongwith documents as Annexure R-1 & R-4 and close his evidence.
4. We have heard both the counsels of the parties and carefully gone through the case file. Admittedly the complainant had purchased a policy no. 177559783 under the plan & term 149-55-10 (LIC’s Jeevan Anand Policy) with date of commencement of 27.07.2011 with Qly mode of premium of Rs. 3464/- in which the premium was paid by 10 years but the complainant has paid the premium 27.07.2011 to 28.3.2014 total amount of Rs. 31898/- has been paid as per Annexure R-4. The main grievance of the complainant is that she made the request to the OP to refund the paid amount alongwith interest but OP has declined to pay the above said amount.
On the other hand, the OP has taken the plea that the complainant had paid only premium up to 01.01.2014 i.e for 2 years 9 months. The premium due for 04/2014 was not paid due which the policy is lying lapse condition as per the terms and conditions of the policy as per Annexure R-1. Nothing is payable to the complainant and also draw our attention towards the terms and conditions of the policy in question as under:
Clause No.3- Non- Forfeiture Regulation:- If after at least 3 full years premiums have been paid in respect of this policy and subsequent premium be not duly paid. This policy shall not be wholly valid but the Sum Assured as the number of premiums actually paid shall bear to the total number originally stipulated for in the Policy provided such reduced sum be not less than Rs. 250/- the policy so reduced shall thereafter be free from all liability for payment of the within mentioned premium. On policy becoming paid up the special provision will cease to apply.
Clause-5:- Forfeiture in certain events:- In case the premiums shall not be duly paid or in case any condition herein contained or endorsed here on shall be contravened or in case it found that any untrue or incorrect statements is contained in the proposal, personal statement, declaration and connected documents or any material information is withheld then and in every such case but subject to the provisions of section 45 of the Insurance Act, 1938, wherever applicable this policy shall be void and all claims to nay benefit in virtue hereof shall cease and determined and all moneys that have been paid in consequence hereof shall belong to the corporation excepting always in so far as relief is provided in terms of the Privileges herein contained or may be lawfully granted by the Corporation.
Clause-7:- Guaranteed Surrender Value:- This policy can be surrendered for cash after the premiums have been paid for at least three years. The minimum surrender value allowable under this policy is equal to 30 percent of the total amount of the within mentioned premiums paid excluding the premiums of the first year and all extra premiums and / or additional premiums for accident benefit that may have been paid. The cash value of any existing Guaranteed Additions will also be allowed”.
5. The counsel for the OP also relied upon the judgment rendered by Hon’ble National Commission in case title “2017 (2) CPR 714(NC) Pushpa Devi Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India” is fully applicable in the present complaint. In view of the above terms and conditions, the complainant has not paid the premium for three years continuously and in view of the terms and conditions clause No.7 the surrender value of the paid amount can be given if the complainant paid the premium at least three years regularly. But in this case the policy of the complainant has already been lapsed and the complainant has failed to prove her case therefore complainant is not entitled to any relief. We do not found any deficiency in service on the part of the OP. Hence, the present complaint is liable to be dismissed and same is hereby dismissed. Copy of the order be sent to the parties concerned, free of costs, as per rules. File after due compliance be consigned to record room.
Announced on : 06.04.2018
(PUSHPENDER KUMAR) (ANAMIKA GUPTA) (D.N. ARORA)
Member Member President
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.