Karnataka

Koppal

CC/14/6

Karibasaiah S/o: Veeraiah Hiremath, R/o: Indaragi, Tq:Dist: Koppal. - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager, LIC of India, Raichur. - Opp.Party(s)

M V Mudgal.

24 Jan 2014

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
OLD CIVIL COURT BUILDING, JAWAHAR ROAD, KOPPAL
 
Complaint Case No. CC/14/6
 
1. Karibasaiah S/o: Veeraiah Hiremath, R/o: Indaragi, Tq:Dist: Koppal.
Age: 56 Years, Occ: Agri., R/o: Indaragi, Tq: Koppal
Koppal
Karnataka.
2. Lalithamma W/o: Karibasaiah Hiremath, R/o: Indaragi.
Age: 48 Years, Occ: Agri., R/o: Indiaragi, Tq:Dist: Koppal.
Koppal.
Karnataka
3. Ramavva Sangappa Davadan
Age: 37 Years, Occ: Agri., R/o: Indiaragi, Tq:Dist: Koppal.
Koppal
Karnataka.
4. Basavaraj Virupakshappa Kumbar
Age: 43 Years, Occ: Agri., R/o: Indiaragi, Tq:Dist: Koppal.
Koppal
Karnataka
5. Bhimappa Thimmappa Bogi
Age: 50 Years, Occ: Agri., R/o: Indiaragi, Tq:Dist: Koppal.
Koppal
Karnataka.
6. Shadakshari Virakshari Kumbar
Age: 59 Years, Occ: Agri., R/o: Indiaragi, Tq:Dist: Koppal.
Koppal
Karnataka.
7. Shivakallamma Ramappa Kumbar
Age: 61 Years, Occ: Agri., R/o: Indiaragi, Tq:Dist: Koppal.
Koppal
Karnataka.
8. Hanumanthappa Devappa Davadan
Age: 56 Years, Occ: Agri., R/o: Indiaragi, Tq:Dist: Koppal.
Koppal
Karnataka.
9. Devamma Hanumanthappa Davadan
Age: 50 Years, Occ: Agri., R/o: Indiaragi, Tq:Dist: Koppal.
Koppal
Karnataka.
10. Thimmappa Mariyappa Pujar
Age: 48 Years, Occ: Agri., R/o: Indiaragi, Tq:Dist: Koppal.
Koppal
Karnataka.
11. Manjunath Baramappa Vanigeri
Age: 46 Years, Occ: Agri., R/o: Indiaragi, Tq:Dist: Koppal.
Koppal
Karnataka.
12. Akkamahadevi Devappa Katigeli
Age: 32 Years, Occ: Agri., R/o: Indiaragi, Tq:Dist: Koppal.
Koppal
Karnataka.
13. Indrappa Hireningappa Kolli
Age: 45 Years, Occ: Agri., R/o: Indiaragi, Tq:Dist: Koppal.
Koppal
Karnataka.
14. Paravva Mallappa Balakundi
Age: 48 Years, Occ: Agri., R/o: Indiaragi, Tq:Dist: Koppal.
Koppal
Karnataka.
15. Maheshamma Gurulinga Kumbar
Age: 36 Years, Occ: Agri., R/o: Indiaragi, Tq:Dist: Koppal.
Koppal
Karnataka
16. Nagappa Balappa Kolli
Age: 30 Years, Occ: Agri., R/o: Indiaragi, Tq:Dist: Koppal.
Koppal
Karnataka.
17. Mahantagouda Shivanagouda Vanageri
Age: 41 Years, Occ: Agri., R/o: Indiaragi, Tq:Dist: Koppal.
Koppal
Karnataka.
18. Manjula Prakash Hirekumbar
Age: 29 Years, Occ: Agri., R/o: Indiaragi, Tq:Dist: Koppal.
Koppal
Karnataka
19. Basavaraj Bhimappa Dollin
Age: 43 Years, Occ: Agri., R/o: Indiaragi, Tq:Dist: Koppal.
Koppal
Karnataka.
20. Subhas Dinesh Vimmi
Age: 45 Years, Occ: Agri., R/o: Indiaragi, Tq:Dist: Koppal.
Koppal
Karnataka.
21. Lalithamma Devendrappa Karli
Age: 40 Years, Occ: Agri., R/o: Indiaragi, Tq:Dist: Koppal.
Koppal
Karnataka
22. Devendrappa Nagaraj Karli
Age: 56 Years, Occ: Agri., R/o: Indiaragi, Tq:Dist: Koppal.
Koppal
Karnataka.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Manager, LIC of India, Raichur.
Life Insurance Corporation of India, Divisional Office, Station Road, Raichur
Raichur
Karnataka.
2. The Manager, LIC of India, Koppal.
Life Insurance Corporation of India, Near Bus Stand, Koppal
Koppal
Karnataka.
3. Thotappa S/o: Mallappa Hadapad, R/o: Hitnal.
The President, Savita Samaja Co-Operative Society (R) Hitnal, R/o: Hitnal, Tq:Dist: Koppal.(Now Residing at: Hosalli Ningapur, Koppal)
Koppal
Karnataka.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONORABLE K.V.Krishnamurthy. PRESIDENT
 HON'ABLE MR. R.BANDACHAR MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

This is a complaint presented u/sec. 12(c) of the Consumer Protection Act – 1986 by 22 persons of Indaragi village with a common relief as under;

 

  1. Policy amount for 22 complainants            -           Rs.   15,400=00
  2. Compensation for 22 complainants            -           Rs. 4,40,000=00
  3. Expenses                                                             -           Rs.    20,000=00

TOTAL                      -           Rs. 4,75,400=00

 

            2.  As per the complaint, each one of the complainants have paid Rs.700/- each to the OP No.3 for payment to LIC but policy has not been issued to them.

 

            3.  Section 12 (C) of the Consumer Protection Act – 1986 permits filing of the complaint in relation to any service by one or more consumers where there are numerous consumers having the same interest on behalf of or benefit of all consumers so interested with the permission of the District Forum.

 

4.  In this case, there are 22 complainants.  Each one having different interest in respect of the service to be rendered, e.g., deficiency in service in respect of complainant No.5, Bhimappa Thimmappa Bogi, another complainant say, the complainant at Sl.No.20, Subhash Dinesh Vimmi could not have any kind of interest.  This is not a case where there are numerous consumers having the same interest.  Each one of the complainant having different interest.  Therefore they should have filed separate complaints in respect of the cause of action if any pertains to them only.  Therefore this Forum declines to grant the permission u/sec. 12 (c) of the Consumer Protection Act – 1986.

 

5.  For the above reasons, the complaint is dismissed at the stage of admission.  The complainants are at liberty to file separate complaint.

 

 
 
[HONORABLE K.V.Krishnamurthy.]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'ABLE MR. R.BANDACHAR]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.