West Bengal

Kolkata-I(North)

MA/9/2024

Pranab Kumar Ghosh - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager, Lexus Motors Ltd. (An Authorised dealer of Tata Motors Ltd.) - Opp.Party(s)

19 Feb 2024

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kolkata - I (North)
8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.
Web-site - confonet.nic.in
 
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/9/2024
( Date of Filing : 15 Jan 2024 )
In
Complaint Case No. CC/206/2020
 
1. Pranab Kumar Ghosh
S/o Ganapati Ghosh, The Registered Owner of Bus bearing Police Registration No. WB-25J-2648, 86B, Satin Sen Sarani (Maniktala Main Road), P.S. - Maniktala, Kolkata - 700054.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. The Manager, Lexus Motors Ltd. (An Authorised dealer of Tata Motors Ltd.)
Plot No. IID/13, Aciton Area, IID, Major Arterial Road, Rajarhat, P.S. - New Town, New Town, Kolkata - 700156.
2. The Manager, Tata Motors Ltd. Eastern Zone
Passenger Vehicle Business Unit, RENE Towers, 2nd Floor, 1842, Rajdanga Main Road, P.O. - East Kolkata Township, P.S. - Kasba, Kolkata - 700107.
3. The Manager, Tata Motors Finance Ltd. (Proforma Opposite Party)
10A, Shakespeare Sarani, Prasad Chamber, Block - B, 1st Floor, (Opposite Of Axis Bank Ltd.), P.S. - Park Street, Kolkata - 700071.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. Firoza Khatoon PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Sailaranjan Das MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Maitreyee Chakraborty MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 19 Feb 2024
Final Order / Judgement

Order No. 2

Ld. Advocate for the complainant/petitioner is present.

Ld. Advocate for the opposite party no.1 is present

Ld. Advocate for the opposite party no.2 is present.

Ld. Advocate for the opposite party no.3 is also present.

Ld. Advocates for all the opposite parties admit that they have received copy of Misc. Application.

Ld. Advocate for the opposite party no.2 files written objection.

The Misc. Application dated 15/01/2024 is taken up for hearing along with written objection filed by opposite party no.2.

The complainant/petitioner has filed instant Misc. Application on the prayer of re-examination of complainant/witness as during evidence inadvertently original documents were not submitted.

In course of hearing none of the Ld. Advocates for opposite parties raised any objection.

For proper adjudication of the case, the prayer of the complainant/petitioner is allowed as a very special chance.

Thus, the Misc. Application is disposed of.

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Firoza Khatoon]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sailaranjan Das]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Maitreyee Chakraborty]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.