Tamil Nadu

North Chennai

CC/56/2015

H.Shakul Hameed, S/o.Hasan Abdul Kadar, - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager, ICICI Bank, - Opp.Party(s)

P.Thirupathiraj

12 Jan 2017

ORDER

                                                                           Complaint presented on:  20.03.2015

                                                                               Order pronounced on:  12.01.2017

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (NORTH)

    2^nd Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C.Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3

 

PRESENT: THIRU.K.JAYABALAN, B.Sc., B.L.,        PRESIDENT

                    TMT.T.KALAIYARASI, B.A.B.L.:           MEMBER II

 

THURSDAY THE 12^th    DAY OF JANUARY 2017

 

                                          C.C.NO.56/2015

 

 

Mr.H.Shakul Hameed,

Son of Mr.Hasan Abdul Kader,

No.67/2, Thiruvalluvarpuram 1^st Street,

Choolaimedu, Chennai – 600 094.

 

                                                                                         ..... Complainant

 

                                     ..Vs..

 

The Manager,

ICICI BANK,

Nelson Manickam Branch,

Nelson Manickam Road,

Aminjikarai, Chennai – 600 029.

                            

                                                                                      …..Opposite party

 

 

         

Date of complaint                                      : 23.03.2015

Counsel for complainant                 :Mr.P.Thirupathi Raj

Counsel for   Opposite Party           :Mr.K.Kumaran

 

 

 

O R D E R

 

BY PRESIDENT THIRU. K.JAYABALAN B.Sc., B.L.,

This complaint is filed by the complainant u/s 12 of the Consumer Protection Act.1986.

No representation for Complainant till 3.00 p.m. Complainant also called absent till then. More than 1 year 4 months time given by way of several hearings to the Complainant to file his proof affidavit he has not filed the same. Today it is posted for filing proof affidavit of the Complainant as last chance and no further adjournment will be given. Even then, the Complaint has chosen to file his proof affidavit. No purpose would be served, if further time given to the Complainant to file his proof affidavit. Hence the Complainant is dismissed for non filing proof affidavit without costs.

                 Pronounced by us on this 12^th day of January 2017.

 

      -sd-                                                                                 -sd-     

MEMBER – II                                                              PRESIDENT